Comparing injecting and sexual risk behaviors of long-term injectors with new injectors: A meta-analysis

Abstract

The present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of injection duration on injection and sexual high-risk behaviors among people who inject drugs (PWID), in order to inform development of intensive HIV prevention services for selected PWID sub-populations. We searched PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Cochrane electronic databases independently in December 2018. After reviewing for duplication, full-texts of selected articles were assessed for eligibility using certain Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes (PICO) criteria. We used fixed and random-effects meta-analysis models to estimate the pooled prevalence, pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our result indicated significant association between age of injection initiation > 17 years, frequency of drug injection > 5 times/day, injection by others, having sex partner, history of imprisonment with new injectors (OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.87–0.98), (OR = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.29–0.73), (OR = 1.11, 95%CI = 1.05–1.17), (OR = 2.08, 95%CI = 1.02–3.14) and (OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.03–1.37). Our research found that new injectors were more likely to report frequency of injections injected by others, has sex partner and prison detention. Our findings are significant for policy makers and public health practitioners to implement and design HIV prevention programs among PWID with shorter periods of injection. The findings of the present study extend our knowledge about new injection drug users, the significance of assured behaviors at IDUs’ initial injection, and the educational importance of syringe exchange programs.

Keywords:

• Injecting
• sexual risk behaviors
• long-term injectors
• new injectors

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to be declared.

Informed consent

There is no informed consent for this review article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Haidar Mohammadi for his assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design AB and BA. Analysis and interpretation of data: HGH and MN. Drafting the manuscript. HRK, EA and AN: Critical revision of the manuscript: BA, EA and AN.