524
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Attitudes toward syringe exchange programs in a rural Appalachian community

, MDORCID Icon, , MPHORCID Icon, , BSORCID Icon, , DO, , PhD, , PhD, CRNAORCID Icon & , MD, MPH, MS show all
Pages 227-234 | Published online: 22 Sep 2021
 

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate community attitudes concerning syringe exchange programs (SEPs) in a rural community as part of an effort to implement evidence-based harm reduction strategies and improve health outcomes related to opioid use disorder.

Methods

Dissemination of a 24-item survey to individuals living in a rural community followed by comparative analysis of survey results based on support for SEPs.

Results

Three hundred and sixty-one individuals responded. Overall, 49.3% of respondents indicated support for syringe exchange. Individuals who support syringe exchange as a harm reduction service are more likely to: agree that opioid use disorder is a real illness (p < 0.0001); agree that anyone can become addicted to pain medications (p = 0.01); agree that medication assisted treatment is effective (p < 0.0001); agree that individuals with OUD have the same right to a job (p < 0.0001); be willing to administer naloxone to a stranger (p < 0.0001); support HIV and HCV screening (p < 0.0001), condom distribution (p < 0.0001), and medication for opioid use disorder (p < 0.0001). They are less likely to believe that harm reduction services encourage drug use (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Positive correlations exist between support for SEPs, awareness of OUD as a chronic illness, less stigmatizing attitudes toward individuals with OUD, and support for other harm reduction strategies. Efforts to increase awareness of OUD as a chronic illness may lead to greater acceptance of harm reduction strategies in rural areas, easing evolution of evidence-based healthy policy.

Acknowledgements

Prisma Health Addiction Research Center provided support for the activities of the survey, statistical analysis, and manuscript completion.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Funding

This project was funded as part of a Health Resources and Services Administration Rural Communities Opioid Response Program‐Planning grant [grant no. GRANT12686474].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 539.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.