Theory/Criticism: A Functionalist Approach to the “Specific Intellectual” Work of Rhetorical Criticism

Abstract

In this essay, the author uses a functionalist perspective to explore the tension between theory and criticism within contemporary rhetorical criticism. Theory and criticism, he argues, exist as the suspension of distinct but mutually constitutive practices. When scholars consider “theory/criticism” in this manner, several functions become evident: theory/criticism organizes the vocabulary necessary to analyze contradictory rhetorical phenomena; it authorizes the value and legitimacy of critical practice, and it makes intervention possible in the lived spaces and structures of specific intellectuals.

Keywords:

• Disciplinary History
• Racialization
• Rhetorical Criticism
• Theory

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the editor of WJC, Robin Rowland, and the many students and colleagues who have influenced the ideas and content of this article.

Notes

1. A frequent debate among rhetoric scholars has been that the field’s legitimacy suffers precisely because of its emphasis on skillful practices rather than systematic knowledge. Our preference for elegant criticism and the case study undermines any general or enduring expertise we might otherwise claim (Campbell, 1974; Hart, 1986). One might argue further that criticism as rhetorical artistry (Dow, 2001) makes graduate training rather difficult. How does one teach a creative practice of theory/criticism? Finally, one can link these critiques to yet a third charge—most rhetorical critics write only for each another. Our theory/criticism excludes the language and subjects necessary to address public or pragmatic concerns and trans-disciplinary audiences (Stroud, 2010).