This essay explores the intimate relationship that exists between rhetoric, history, and collective memory. Using the Goldhagen debate as a case study, the authors contend that both “histories” and “collective memories” are discursive constructs that should not be viewed as antithetical concepts; rather, they argue that each involves questions of identity, tradition, and forgetfulness. Furthermore, the authors argue that the polysemic nature of salient historical events brings with it competing nationalistic narratives. They conclude that the Goldhagen controversy created an international furor because the claim that “ordinary” Germans voluntarily perpetrated the Holocaust tapped into an assortment of collective memories.
Rhetoric, history, and collective memory: Decoding the Goldhagen debates
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.