Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of a passage-copying measure that could be used to indicate general writing proficiency among secondary school English language learners. Participants were 57 students in 3 high school English as a second language classes. Alternate-form reliabilities for passage copying were generally in the moderate range; validity coefficients were also moderate. Sufficiently reliable and valid scoring procedures are identified for further study.
Notes
Note. SD are in parentheses. MBST = Minnesota Basic Skills Test; TEAE = Test of Emerging Academic English; TOWL–3 = Test of Written Language–Third Edition.
a N = 57.
b N = 29.
c N = 37.
d N = 33.
Note. MBST = Minnesota Basic Skills Test; TEAE = Test of Emerging Academic English; TOWL–3 = Test of Written Language–Third Edition.
a N = 57.
b N = 29.
c N = 37.
d N = 33.
**p < .01, 2-tailed.
Note. SD are in parentheses. WW = words written; CW = correct words; CIW = correct minus incorrect words; %CW = percent correct words; CWS = correct word sequences; CIWS = correct minus incorrect word sequences; %CWS = percent correct word sequences.
a N = 53.
b N = 54.
c N = 55.
d N = 51.
Note. Sufficiently reliable scoring procedures (r = .65) are bolded. WW = words written; CW = correct words; CIW = correct minus incorrect words; %CW = percent correct words; CWS = correct word sequences; CIWS = correct minus incorrect word sequences; %CWS = percent correct word sequences.
**p < .01, 2-tailed.
Note. Sufficiently valid scoring procedures (r = .50) are bolded. MBST = Minnesota Basic Skills Test; TEAE = Test of Emerging Academic English; TOWL–3 = Test of Written Language–Third Edition; CIW = correct minus incorrect words; CWS = correct word sequences; CIWS = correct minus incorrect word sequences; WW = words written; CW = correct words.
*p < .05, 2-tailed. **p < .01, 2-tailed.