Abstract
There are ample research and position papers advocating response-to-intervention (RTI) frameworks to address the academic struggles of students identified as English language learners (ELLs) and to prevent inequitable outcomes such as overrepresentation in special education. However, some scholars have questioned how RTI is conceptualized and implemented with ELLs. This systematic literature review explores how the existing research on RTI for ELLs has addressed (a) the quality and appropriateness of Tier 1 practices for ELLs and (b) linguistic factors as contexts that impact this quality. A key finding is that current research is not sufficiently linked to general education instruction. Thus, we suggest that future RTI research address instruction for ELLs in general education settings, including the incorporation of Title I supports, bilingual education and language acquisition programs, and culturally responsive pedagogy into Tier 1 universal interventions.
Acknowledgments
Kathleen King Thorius is now at Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN. Amanda L. Sullivan is now at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
We wish to express our gratitude to the Equity Alliance at ASU for providing an intellectual community that nurtured this work. In particular, we thank Alfredo Artiles, Elizabeth Kozleski, Federico Waitoller, Jorge Aguilar Rodriguez, and Jeni Huber for valuable feedback provided in response to drafts of this article, as well as Annmarie Urso, editor of the theme issue, for her supportive comments along the way.
Notes
Note. ELL = English language learner; LEP = limited English proficient; DIBELS = Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills; CBM = curriculum-based measure.