1,579
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Discovering and Proving Infinite Pochhammer Sum Identities

Abstract

We consider nested sums involving the Pochhammer symbol at infinity and rewrite them in terms of a small set of constants, such as powers of π, log(2), or zeta values. In order to perform these simplifications, we view the series as specializations of generating series. For these generating series, we derive integral representations in terms of root-valued iterated integrals or directly in terms of cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms. Using substitutions, we express the root-valued iterated integrals as cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms. Finally, by applying known relations among the cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms, we derive expressions in terms of several constants. We provide an algorithimic machinery to prove identities which so far could only be proved using classical hypergeometric approaches. These methods are implemented in the computer algebra package HarmonicSums.

AMS Subject Classifications:

1. Infinite nested Pochhammer sums

The goal of this article is to find and prove identities of the following form: n=1(12)ni=1nj=1i1j2i(n+1)!=3ζ3,n=1(12)ni=1nj=1i1ji3(n+1)!=2l2434ζ3l2+23π2l22+16p413π4180,n=1(14)ni=1n1i2(n+1)!=7π21816C36l22+2πl2,n=1(13)n(i=1n13i+1i=1n13i+2)(n+1)!=π3343πΓ(56)23Γ(13),n=1(12)ni=1nj=1i12j+12i+1(2n+1)2n!=196π(4π2l272l22+56l239ζ3),i=1(13)ni=1nj=1ik=1jl=1km=1l1mlkji(n+1)!=180ζ5π53,n=1(12)ni=1n1i9(n+1)!=2339π8l245360079π6l235670175π4l258945π2l27+8l29283579π6ζ3378015π4l22ζ349π2l24ζ3+1645l26ζ343π2l2ζ32+163l23ζ32+8ζ3333π4ζ5104π2l22ζ5+8l24ζ5+48l2ζ3ζ56π2ζ7+72l22ζ7+340ζ93, where (x)n denotes the Pochhammer symbol, lk:=log(k),ζk:=n=11nk, and C denotes Catalan’s constant.

Note that similar identities were given in [CitationAblinger 17, CitationLiu and Wang 19]. Such identities are of interest in physics: In particular, such sums have been studied in order to perform calculations of higher-order corrections to scattering processes in particle physics [CitationAblinger et al. 14, CitationDavydychev and Kalmykov 01, Citation04, CitationFleischer et al. 99, CitationJegerlehner et al. 03, CitationKalmykov and Veretin 00, CitationKalmykov et al. 07, CitationOgreid and Osland 98, CitationWeinzierl 04]. Moreover, similar identities were also considered [CitationBorwein et al. 01, CitationBorwein and Lisoněk 00, CitationLehmer 85, CitationZhi-Wei 11, CitationZucker 85], and there is a connection to Apéry’s proof of the irrationality of ζ(3) (see [CitationBorwein and Borwein 87]) [CitationWeinzierl 04, CitationZhi-Wei 11, CitationZucker 85].

While [CitationAblinger 17] basically deals with sums of the form n=1(12)nn!f(n) and n=1(12)nn!f(n), we are going to consider a much wider class of sums in the frame of this paper. In addition, we will state a general computer algebra method to evaluate a large class of sums in terms of nested integrals. Moreover, we will be able to prove a structural theorem, about when such a sum can be expressed in terms of the so-called cyclotomic polylogarithms.

The main purpose of this article is to present methods which can be automated; hence, not all identities presented in this paper are new identities. To make more precise which class of sums we are considering, some definitions are in place. Let rN and let ai,ciN and biN0 for 1ir then we call S(a1,b1,c1),,(ar,br,cr)(n) defined as (1–1) S(a1,b1,c1),,(ar,br,cr)(n):=i1=1n1(a1i1+b1)c1i2=1i11(a2i2+b2)c2ir=1ir11(arir+br)cr(1–1) a cyclotomic harmonic sum (compare [CitationAblinger and Blümlein 13, CitationAblinger et al. 11, Citation14, CitationAblinger 13]) of depth r. Note that if ai = 1 and bi = 0 for 1ir we write (1–2) Sc1,c2,,cr(n):=S(1,0,c1),(1,0,c2),,(1,0,cr)(n),(1–2) and we call Sc1,c2,,cr(n) a multiple harmonic sum (see, e.g., [CitationAblinger et al. 13, CitationAblinger 13, CitationBlümlein and Kurth 99, CitationBlümlein 00, CitationVermaseren 99]).

The sums we are considering take the form (1–3) n=1(p)n(an+b)c(n+d)!f(n)(1–3) where a,b,c,dN0,pR, and f(n) is a cyclotomic harmonic sum. We will refer to Equation(1–3) as Pochhammer sum.

We are going to find representations of these Pochhammer sums in terms of special classes of integrals (that are similar to the iterated integrals in [CitationAblinger et al. 14] and correspond to the iterated integrals in [CitationAblinger 17]). These classes of integrals are iterated integrals over hyperexponential functions. More precisely a function f(x) is called hyperexponential if f(x)f(x)=q(x) where q(x) is a rational function in x.

Then, an iterated integral over the hyperexponential functions f1(x),f2(x),,fk(x) is defined recursively by G(f1(τ),f2(τ),,fk(τ),x)=0xf1(τ1)G(f2(τ),,fk(τ),τ1)dτ1, with the special case G(x)=1. Since some letters might have a non-integrable singularity at the base point x= 0 we consistently define G(f(τ),x):=0x(f(t)ct)dt+clog(x), where c takes the unique value such that the integrand on the right hand side is integrable at t=0. It is important to note that this definition preserves the derivative ddxG(f(τ),x) = f(x). In general, we set G(f1(τ),,fj(τ),x):=0x(f1(t)G(f2(τ),,fj(τ),t)i=0kcilog(t)it)dt+i=0kcii+1log(x)i+1, where k and c0,,ck are chosen to remove any non-integrable singularity. Again the result is unique and retains ddxG(f1(τ),,fj(τ),x)=f1(x)G(f2(τ),,fj(τ),x).

In the following, we will define a subclass of iterated integrals (compare [CitationAblinger et al. 11]). For aN and bN, b<φ(a), where φ denotes Euler’s totient function, we define fab:(0,1)Rfab(x)={1x,if a=b=0xbΦa(x),otherwise, where Φa(x) denotes the ath cyclotomic polynomial, e.g., the first cyclotomic polynomials are given by Φ1(x)=x1Φ2(x)=x+1Φ3(x)=x2+x+1Φ4(x)=x2+1Φ5(x)=x4+x3+x2+x+1  etc.

Now, let mi=(ai,bi)N2, bi<φ(ai); for x(0,1), we define cyclotomic polylogarithms recursively as follows (compare, e.g., [CitationAblinger et al. 11]): H(x)=1,Hm1,,mk(x)={1k!(logx)k,if mi=(0,0)0xfa1b1(y)Hm2,,mk(y)dy,otherwise.

We call k the weight of a cyclotomic polylogarithm and in case the limit exists we extend the definition to x = 1 and write Hm1,,mk(1):=limx1Hm1,,mk(x).

Note that restricting the alphabet to the letters (0,0),(1,0), and (2,0) leads to harmonic polylogarithms [CitationRemiddi and Vermaseren 00].

The proposed strategy to prove and find Pochhammer sum identities reads as follows and follows the method proposed in [CitationAblinger 17]):

  • Step 1: Rewrite the sums in terms of nested integrals.

  • Step 2: Rewrite the integrals in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms (see [CitationAblinger 17, Section 4]).

  • Step 3: Provide a sufficiently strong database to eliminate relations among these cyclotomic polylogarithms and find reduced expressions (see Section 4).

This article focuses on Step 1, and we will present three different possibilities to find integral representations of Pochhammer sums. In order to accomplish this task, we view infinite sums as specializations of generating functions [CitationAblinger 17, CitationAblinger et al. 14]. Namely, if we are given an integral representation of the generating function of a sequence, then we can obtain an integral representation for the infinite sum over that sequence if the limit x1 can be carried out. This approach to infinite sums can be summarized by the following formula: i=1f(i)=limx1i=1xif(i).

For details on Step 2 (implemented in the command SpecialGLToH in HarmonicSums) and on Step 3 we refer to [CitationAblinger 17]. It has to be mentioned that we computed and used relation tables of harmonic polylogarithms at one up to weight 12, for cyclotomic polylogarithms of cyclotomy 4 and 6 we computed and used relation tables of cyclotomic polylogarithms at 1 up to weight 6. The size of these tables amounts to several gigabytes. Note that the full strategy has been implemented in the Mathematica package HarmonicSumsFootnote1 [CitationAblinger 14].

To complete this introduction we define a number of constants that will appear throughout this article:

Here, we extend the definition (Equation1Equation2) to negative indices by Sc1,c2,,cr(n):=i1=1nsign(c1)i1|i1|c1i2=1i1sign(c2)i2|i2|c2ir=1ir1sign(cr1)ir|ir|cr.

Note that these constants do not possess any further relations induced by the algebraic properties given in Ablinger [CitationAblinger 17, Section 4], namely shuffle, stuffle, multiple argument, and duality relations, but it is presently not known, whether these constants obey further algebraic equations or not. In few of this question corresponding to logarithms of integers, we refer to Baker’s theorem [CitationBaker 66]. Note that for the subclass of multiple zeta values and Euler sums, we use the slightly different, but equivalent, set of constants compared to [CitationBlümlein et al. 10]. For details on how the constants of [CitationBlümlein et al. 10] can be rewritten in terms of the constants given above, we refer to the accompanying Mathematica notebook.

In the following sections, we will use different methods to compute integral representations of the generating function. In Section 2, we will use holonomic closure properties, while in sections Citation3 and Citation4 we will use rewrite rules. In Section 4, we will consider a subclass of Pochhammer sums, for which we can directly find representations in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms, i.e., we do not have to deal with Step 2 of the proposed strategy.

2. Using closure properties of holonomic functions to derive generating functions

In the following, we repeat important definitions and properties (compare [CitationAblinger 16, CitationAblinger et al. 14, CitationKauers and Paule 11]). Let K be a field of characteristic 0. A function f=f(x) is called holonomic (or D-finite) if there exist polynomials pd(x),pd1(x),,p0(x)K[x] (not all pi being 0) such that the following holonomic differential equation holds: (2–1) pd(x)f(d)(x)++p1(x)f(x)+p0(x)f(x)=0.(2–1)

We emphasize that the class of holonomic functions is rather large due to its closure properties. Namely, if we are given two such differential equations that contain holonomic functions f(x) and g(x) as solutions, one can compute holonomic differential equations that contain f(x)+g(x), f(x)g(x), or 0xf(y)dy as solutions. In other words, any composition of these operations over known holonomic functions f(x) and g(x) is again a holonomic function h(x). In particular, if for the inner building blocks f(x) and g(x), the holonomic differential equations are given, also the holonomic differential equation of h(x) can be computed.

Of special importance is the connection to recurrences. A sequence (fn)n0 with fnK is called holonomic (or P-finite) if there exist polynomials pd(n),pd1(n),,p0(n)K[n] (not all pi being 0) such that the holonomic recurrence (2–2) pd(n)fn+d++p1(n)fn+1+p0(n)fn=0(2–2) holds for all nN (from a certain point on). In the following, we utilize the fact that holonomic functions are precisely the generating functions of holonomic sequences: if f(x) is holonomic, then the coefficients fn of the formal power series expansion f(x)=n=0fnxn form a holonomic sequence. Conversely, for a given holonomic sequence (fn)n0, the function defined by the above sum (i.e., its generating function) is holonomic (this is true in the sense of formal power series, even if the sum has a zero radius of convergence). Note that given a holonomic differential equation for a holonomic function f(x), it is straightforward to construct a holonomic recurrence for the coefficients of its power series expansion. For a recent overview of this holonomic machinery and further literature, we refer to [CitationKauers and Paule 11].

Since cyclotomic sums are holonomic sequences with respect to n and the iterated integrals we consider are holonomic functions with respect to x, we can use holonomic closure properties to derive integral representations of Pochhammer sums: Given a Pochhammer sum n=1(p)n(an+b)c(n+d)!g(n), where g(n) is a cyclotomic sum. We proceed as proposed in on page 3: define fn:=(p)n(an+b)c(n+d)!g(n) and try to find an iterated integral representation of f(x):=n=1xnfn using the following steps:

  1. Compute a holonomic recurrence equation for (fn)n0.

  2. Compute a holonomic differential equation for f(x).

  3. Compute initial values for the differential equation.

  4. Solve the differential equation to get a closed form representation for f(x).

This procedure is implemented in the packages HarmonicSums and can be called by ComputeGeneratingFunction[Pochhammer[p,n](an+b)c(n+d)!g[n],x,{n,1,}].

We will succeed in finding a closed form representation for f(x) in terms of iterated integrals, if we can find a full solution set of the derived differential equation. The command ComputeGeneratingFunction internally uses the differential solver implemented in HarmonicSums, which finds all solutions of holonomic differential equations that can be expressed in terms of iterated integrals over hyperexponential alphabets [CitationAblinger 16, CitationAblinger et al. 14, CitationBronstein 92, CitationPetkovšek 92, CitationHendriks and Singer 99]; these solutions are called d’Alembertian solutions [CitationAbramov and Petkovšek 94], in addition for differential equations of order two it finds all solutions that are Liouvillian [CitationAblinger 17a, CitationKovacic 86, CitationHendriks and Singer 99].

If we succeed in finding a closed form representation for f(x) in terms of iterated integrals, we proceed with Step 2 and Step 3 of the proposed strategy. Hence, we send x1 and try to transform these iterated integrals to expression in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms and finally we use relations between cyclotomic polylogarithms at one to derive an expression in terms of known constants.

The Pochhammer sum (2–3) n=1(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!(2–3) will deal as a representative example to illustrate all three different methods that are presented in this article. First, we work out the sum using the method presented above.

Example 1.

We consider the sum Equation(2–3) and start to derive a recurrence for fn:=(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!; we find: (2+n)(4+n)2(1+2n)(3+2n)fn2(1+n)(5+n)2(3+2n)(5+2n)fn+1+4(1+n)(2+n)(3+n)(6+n)2fn+2=0.

Using the closure properties of holonomic functions, we find the following differential equation 96f(x)+3(250+343x)f(x)+3(144590x+481x2)f(x)+x(352942x+599x2)f(3)(x)+8x2(920x+11x2)f(4)(x)+4(1+x)2x3f(5)(x)=0, satisfied by n=1xn(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!.

We can solve this differential equation for example using the differential equation solver implemented in HarmonicSums: SolveDE[96f[x]+3(250+343x)f[x]+3(144590x+481x2)f[x]+x(352942x+599x2)f(3)[x]+8x2(920x+11x2)f(4)[x]+4(1+x)2x3f(5)[x]==0,f[x],x].

By checking initial values we find (2–4) 17350x3(1776+808x319x2888x3600x4+6656[G(1ττ;x)G(1τ;x)]+3360[G(1τ,1τ;x)G(1τ,1ττ;x)+G(1ττ,11τ;x)+G(1ττ,1τ;x)G(1ττ,1ττ;x)]+41x((404218x111x275x3)[G(11τ;x)G(1τ;x)+G(1ττ;x)]+222(2xx2))).(2–4)

At this point we send x1 and use the command SpecialGLToH in HarmonicSums to derive an expression in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms (compare [CitationAblinger 17, Section 3]). This leads to 936773503328H(0,0)(1)3675+835H(0,0)(1)264H(2,0)(1)36753235H(2,0)(1)21635H(0,0),(0,0)(1)3235H(0,0),(1,0)(1)3235H(2,0),(0,0)(1)+6435H(2,0),(1,0)(1)+6435H(2,0),(2,0)(1).

Finally, we can use relations between cyclotomic polylogarithms at one (compare [Ablinger Citation17, Section 4]) to derive (2–5) n=1(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!=9367+560π2+6720l22128l27350.(2–5)

Note that in the last step of this example we are actually only dealing with harmonic polylogarithms (see [CitationRemiddi and Vermaseren 00]).

Let us now list several identities that could be computed using this method: n=1(13)nS1,1,1(n)(n+1)!=18ζ3π33,n=1(13)nS2(n)(n+1)!=5π216+27h18+383πl327l3216,n=1(14)nS2(n)(n+1)!=16C3+7π2186l22+2πl2,n=1(12)nS(2,1,1)(n)(2n+1)2n!=14πl2(3l22),n=1(12)nS(2,1,1),(2,1,1)(n)(2n+1)2n!=196π(4π2l272l22+56l239ζ3).

Several formulas that can be found in [CitationLiu and Wang 19] can be also discovered and proved using the described method. Here, we are going to list some of them: n=0(12)n(S1(n)2S2(n))(n+1)!=8l22+2π23,n=0(12)n(S1(n)33S1(n)S2(n)+2S3(n))(n+1)!=24ζ3+16l23+4π2l2,n=0(14)n(S1(n)33S1(n)S2(n)+2S3(n))(n+1)!=96Cl2+16πC+72ζ3+36l2318πl22+13π2l29π32,n=0(14)n(S1(n)2S2(n))(n+1)!=288Cl2+48πC+216ζ3+108l23+54πl22+39π2l2+27π32,n=0(14)n(S1(n)2S2(n))(n+1)!=32C3+12l224πl2+13π29,n=0(34)n(S1(n)2S2(n))(n+1)!=32C+36l22+12πl2+13π23,n=1(12)n1(S1(n)22S1(n)+S2(n))n!=8.

Note that this method can also be used to compute integral representations of sums of the form n=1xn(3)nS3(n)n2n!.

Here, we find n=1xn(3)nS3(n)n2n!=H(0,0),(1,0),(0,0),(0,0),(1,0)(x)3Li2(x)24Li3(x)2(1+x)32log(1x)Li3(x)+3Li4(x)2+Li5(x). and sending for instance x12 we get: n=1(12)n(3)nS3(n)n2n!.=π4192π2l212+π4l2288116π2l22+l236572π2l23+l2416+11l25120+3p42+3l2p4+4p5+7ζ387π2ζ348+21l2ζ316+78l22ζ381ζ564.

Finally, we consider (2–6) n=1(12)nS11(n)(n+1)!,(2–6) proceeding as proposed, we find a differential equation of order 16: 430080f(x)+210(4096+1592275x)f(x)+42(335544326356812x+407269601x2)f(x)+(67108864033746963856x8037305736x2+192200072453x3)f(3)(x)+x(11047661360204994450032x61653276602x2+771941124781x3)f(4)(x)+13x2(381282305638280317036x13991732902x2+109483643797x3)f(5)(x)+26x3(355530839622952549314x9866689087x2+53652573053x3)f(6)(x)+572x4(152216474697858881x344085550x2+1394066246x3)f(7)(x)+143x5(3235838961123610312x623388464x2+1975831409x3)f(8)(x)+143x6(103854560285705072x175728306x2+451597351x3)f(9)(x)+286x7(1049201623636810x15928139x2+34105982x3)f(10)(x)+3x8(130094536246156812x180008400x2+328091581x3)f(11)(x)+x9(3284221653242200x41920782x2+66163633x3)f(12)(x)+x10(17626402487876x2095294x2+2904173x3)f(13)(x)+2x11(2890035986x32239x2+39703x3)f(14)(x)+4x12(262291x276x2+305x3)f(15)(x)+8(1+x)2x13(1+x)f(16)(x)=0.

Solving this differential equation is possible but takes quite some time, so this indicates that we might look for more feasible methods to find generating function representations for Pochhammer sums of that kind. In the following sections, we will introduce rewrite rules, which will allow to compute generating function representations of Pochhammer sums without having to solve differential equations.

3. Using rewrite rules to derive generating functions

In this section, we are going to state rewrite rules which will allow us to find integral representations of the generating functions of Pochhammer sums without having to solve differential equations. We will summarize these rewrite rules in the following lemmas. We start with the base cases where there is no inner sum present:

Lemma 2.

LetK be a field of characteristic0. Then, the following identities hold in the ringK[[x]] of formal power series witha,cN andb,dZ: (3–1) n=1xn(p)n(n+d)!=(1x)dpxd(p)d,d<0,(3–1) (3–2) n=1xn(p)nn=(1x)p1,(3–2) (3–3) n=1xn(p)n(n+d)!=(1x)dppd!xd0x(1t)pd1tddt,d>0,(3–3) (3–4) n=1xn(p)n(a n+b)c(n+d)!=xbaa0xtba1n=1tn(p)n(a n+b)c1(n+d)!dt.(3–4)

In case an inner sum is present, we will make use of the following three lemmas.

Lemma 3.

LetK be a field of characteristic0 and letf:NK. Then the following identity holds in the ringK[[x]] of formal power series withd < 0: (3–5) n=1xn(p)n(n+d)!i=1nf(i)=(1x)dpxd((p)di=1df(i)+0x(1t)pd1t1dn=1tn(p)n(n+d1)!f(n)dt).(3–5)

Proof.

Both sides satisfy the following initial value problem for y(x), which has a unique solution near x=0: y(x)pxd(1x)xy(x)=1(1x)xn=1xn(p)n(n+d1)!f(n),y(0)=0.

Lemma 4.

LetK be a field of characteristic0 and letf:NK. Then the following identity holds in the ringK[[x]] of formal power series withd0: (3–6) n=1xn(p)n(n+d)!i=1nf(i)=(1x)dpxd0xtd1(1t)pd1n=1tn(p)n(n+d1)!f(n)dt.(3–6)

Proof.

Both sides satisfy the following initial value problem for y(x), which has a unique solution near x=0: y(x)p xd(1x)xy(x)=1(1x)xn=1xn(p)n(n+d1)!f(n),y(0)=0.

Lemma 5.

Let K be a field of characteristic 0 and let f:NK. Then the following identity holds in the ring K[[x]] of formal power series with a,cN and bZ: (3–7) n=1xn(p)n(a n+b)c(n+d)!i=1nf(i)=xbaa0xtba1n=1tn(p)n(a n+b)c1(n+d)!i=1nf(i)dt.(3–7)

Proof.

Both sides satisfy the following initial value problem for y(x), which has a unique solution near x=0: y(x)ba xy(x)=1a xn=1xn(p)n(a n+b)c1(n+d)!i=1nf(i),y(0)=0.

Note that formulas related to the previous lemmas concerning binomial sums can be found in [CitationAblinger et al. 14].

Let us now, for the second time, consider Equation(2–3) and illustrate how the previous lemmas can be used as rewrite rules to find integral representations of Pochhammer sums.

Example 6.

We again look for a closed form representation in terms of iterated integrals of n=1xn(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!.

We start by using Lemma 5 twice: n=1xn(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!=x30xt2n=1tnS1(n)(12)n(3+n)(n1)!dt=x30xt10tu2n=1unS1(n)(12)n(n1)!dudt.

Now we apply Lemma 3 followed by applying Equation(3–4) and Equation(3–1) n=1xn(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!=x30xt10tu31u(0u1v21vn=1vn(12)nn(n2)!dv12)dudt=x30xt10tu31u(0u1v21v0v1wn=1wn(12)n(n2)!dwdv12)dudt=x30xt10tu31u(0u1v21v0vw4(1w)32dwdv12)dudt.

At this point, we rewrite the expression in terms of iterated integrals (this can be done by hand or by using the command GLIntegrate of HarmonicSums) and arrive again at Equation(2–4) and hence we can proceed as in Example 1 to arrive at n=1(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!=9367+560π2+6720l22128l27350.

Note that this method is implemented in the package HarmonicSums using the command PochhammerSumToGL. Calling PochhammerSumToGL[Pochhammer[12,n]S[1,n](3+n)2(n1)!,x,{n,1,}] will immediately (after regrouping) give Equation(2–4).

Reconsidering Equation(2–6) we find n=1(12)nS11(n)(n+1)!=4G(1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ1τ;1)+2G(1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ,1τ1τ;1)=677π10l24752002339π8l2368040079π6l25283502π4l2715754π2l298505+16l2111559252339π8ζ345360079π6l22ζ31890115π4l24ζ38135π2l26ζ3+8315l28ζ315π4l2ζ3289π2l23ζ32+1615l25ζ324π2ζ339+163l22ζ3379π6ζ5126035π4l22ζ543π2l24ζ5+1615l26ζ58π2l2ζ3ζ5+32l23ζ3ζ5+24ζ32ζ5+72l2ζ529π4ζ71012π2l22ζ7+24l24ζ7+144l2ζ3ζ7170π2ζ99+6803l22ζ9+372ζ11.

Note that all the identities listed in Section 2 can also be computed using rewrite rules. But using these rewrite rules turns out to be much more efficient. We are now going to list several additional identities that could be computed with the help of this command: (3–8) n=1(13)nS3(n)(n+1)!=5π3323+9163πh115π2l33281h1l3169323πl32+27l3332+6ζ3,(3–8) (3–9) i=1(12)nS1,1,1,1,1(n)(n+1)!=60ζ5,(3–9) (3–10) i=1(13)nS1,1,1,1,1(n)(n+1)!=180ζ5π53,(3–10) (3–11) n=1(12)nS4(n)n(n+1)!=π42023π2l2249π2l23+4l243+8l2515+16l2p4+16p57π2ζ312+8l2ζ3+7l22ζ363ζ58,(3–11) (3–12) n=1(12)nS3,1(n)(n+1)!n3=13π4180+π6189+199π6l2756023π2l22427π4l232l243+845π2l2516p4+163π2l2p4+16π2p53+24s1+200l2s17+136s27200s373π2ζ32+29π4ζ3168+4l2ζ33π2l2ζ3+56π2l22ζ332l24ζ336p4ζ3+9ζ3282437l2ζ32+75ζ542935π2ζ51689l2ζ51112l22ζ5+12685ζ7112,(3–12) (3–13) n=1(12)nS3(n)(n+1)!n5=37π4360+89π6504063031π83024000+23π2l2+37180π4l2+463π6l27560+13π2l22+47180π4l22+1079π6l2275608l233+29π2l23+47270π4l23l243518π2l24+19180π4l242l251519π2l25+2l265127π2l26+4l2735+l28358p443π2p4+49π4p4+16l22p4+16p5+83π2p5+32l2p532l22p5163π2p6128l2p6+64l22p6128p7+384l2p7+1100s51343π2s132l2s1104l22s1+693940s416s3+32s264l2s2+128s680s74ζ3+7π2ζ31213π4ζ3607l2ζ327190π4l2ζ37l22ζ3209π2l23ζ3+43l25ζ3160p5ζ343π2ζ3229l2ζ32+32l22ζ32203ζ58249π2ζ5162034l2ζ536112π2l2ζ52034l22ζ5+2012l23ζ5+393ζ3ζ58+3955ζ7161153316l2ζ7+640p8+48l2s3.(3–13)

To conclude this section we consider the sum n=1(12)nS(3,1,1)(n)(n1)!n.

We find that it equals (3–14) 12G(1τ1τ1/3;1)+2G(1τ1+τ1/3+τ2/3;1)33G(1ττ1/3;1)2G(1ττ1/31+τ1/3+τ2/3;1)45.(3–14)

Here, we fail to transform the iterated integrals in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms; however, since the integrals are simple enough, we are able to perform the integrals in Equation(3–14) for example by using Mathematica and find the result n=1(12)nS(3,1,1)(n)(n1)!n=4π3/2273Γ(53)Γ(116).

Another example where we fail to transform the iterated integrals in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms but still can do the integrals is n=1(13)n(S(3,1,1)(n)S(3,2,1)(n))(n+1)!=34+π33πΓ(56)23Γ(13).

In the following section, we will consider a subclass of Pochhammer sums, for which we will always be able to derive a representation in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms.

4. Using rewrite rules to directly derive generating functions in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms

In this section, we will deal with a subclass of the Pochhammer sums, namely we restrict the inner sum to be a multiple harmonic sum and we set p=1/q with qZ{0} and a = 1 in (1–3), i.e., we are considering sums of the form (4–1) n=1(p)n(n+b)c(n+d)!Sc1,c2,,cr(n),(4–1) where c,ciN,b,dZ and p=1q with qZ{0}. Considering a Pochhammer sum in this subclass we could again use the rewrite rules presented in Section 3 to find an integral representation, however we can also use the following lemmas. These new rewrite rules will directly lead to cyclotomic polylogarithms. We again start with the base cases where no inner sum is present (compare Lemma 2):

Lemma 7.

LetK be a field of characteristic0. Then, the following identities hold in the ringK[[x]] of formal power series withcN andb,dZ: (4–2) n=1xn(p)n(n+d)!=(1x)dpxd|p| d!1(1x)|p|(1t1|p|)dt1sign(p)td|p|dt,d>0,(4–2) (4–3) n=1xn(p)n(n+b)c(n+d)!=1|p| xb1(1x)|p|(1t1|p|)b1t11|p|n=1(p)n(1t1|p|)n(n+b)c1(n+d)!dt.(4–3)

In the cases where there is an inner multiple harmonic sum present we can refine the Lemmas 3, 4, and 5 and get the following result.

Lemma 8.

Let K be a field of characteristic 0 and let f:NK. Then the following identities hold in the ring K[[x]] of formal power series with cN,b,dZ and Sm1,,mr(n) a multiple harmonic sum: (4–4) c=0,d<0:n=1xn(p)n(n+d)!Sm1,,mr(n)=(1x)dpxd((p)ds(d)1|p|1(1x)|p|(1t1|p|)d1t1sign(p)td|p|n=1(1t1|p|)n(p)n(n+d1)!nm1s¯(n)dt);(4–4) (4–5) c=0,d0:n=1xn(p)n(n+d)!Sm1,,mr(n)=(1x)dpxd|p|1(1x)|p|(1t1|p|)d1t1sign(p)td|p|n=1(1t1|p|)n(p)n(n+d1)!nm1s¯(n)dt;(4–5) (4–6) c>0:n=1xn(p)n(n+b)c(n+d)!Sm1,,mr(n)=xb|p|1(1x)|p|t1|p|1(1t1|p|)b1n=1(1t1|p|)n(p)n(n+b)c1(n+d)!s(n)dt.(4–6)

Here, we use the abbreviations s(n):=Sm1,,mr(n) and s¯(n):=Sm2,,mr(n).

Proof.

For all these equalities, it is possible to find an initial value problem, which has a unique solution near x= 0 and is satisfied by both sides of the respective equation. □

Note that the polynomials arising in the left hand sides of the equations in Lemmas 7 and Citation8 are of the form ti or (1ti)k for i,kZ, hence integrating over these integrands will lead to cyclotomic polylogarithms. Therefore, the Pochhammer sums of the form Equation(4–1) will be expressible in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms, and we can state the following structural theorem.

Theorem 9.

Any sum of the form (4–7) n=1(1q)n(n+b)c(n+d)!Sc1,c2,,cr(n),(4–7) where c,ciN,b,dZ and qZ{0}, can be expressed in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms at one.

Let us now, for the third time, consider Equation(2–3) and illustrate how the previous lemmas can be used as rewrite rules to directly find a representation in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms.

Example 10.

We seek a closed form representation in terms of cyclotomic polylogarithms of n=1xn(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!, so we use Equation(4–6) twice: n=1xn(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!=2x311xt(1t2)2n=1(1t2)n(12)nS1(n)(3+n)(n1)! dt=4x311xt1t21tu(1u2)2n=1(1u2)n(12)nS1(n)(n1)! du dt.

Now, we apply Equation(4–4) followed by applying Equation(4–3) and Equation(3–1): n=1xn(12)nS1(n)(3+n)2(n1)!=4x311xt1t21t(1u2)3(21un=1(1v2)n(12)nn(n2)!(1v2)2 dv+12) du dt=4x311xt1t21t(1u2)3(1u1v4wn=1(1w2)n(12)n(n2)!1w2 dw(1v2)2 dv12) du dt=4x311xt1t21t(1u2)3(1u1vw21w2 dw(1v2)2 dv12) du dt.

Now, we can send x1 and rewrite this expression directly in terms of cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms (again this can be done by hand or by using the command GLIntegrate of HarmonicSums) and arrive again at (4–8) 9367735064H(2,0)(1)36753235H(0,0),(1,0)(1)3235H(2,0),(0,0)(1)+6435H(2,0),(1,0)(1).(4–8)

Finally, we can again use relations between cyclotomic polylogarithms at one to derive Equation(2–5).

Note that this is implemented in the command PochhammerSumToH, so calling PochhammerSumToH[Pochhammer[12,n]S[1,n](n+3)2(n1)!,x,{n,1,}] will immediately give (after pretty printing) 11856+2552x+537x2600x37350x3+41x(1482+107x+75x3)3675x3+(643675x3+41x(1276+218x+111x2+75x3)3675x3)H1(1x)41x(1276+218x+111x2+75x3)H0(1x)3675x3+H1(1)(643675x341x(1276+218x+111x2+75x3)3675x3+64H1(1x)35x3)96H1,0(1)35x3+32H1,0(1x)35x364H1,1(1)35x364H0,1(1)35x3+32H0,1(1)35x364H1,1(1x)35x3+32H1,0(1x)35x3.

Sending s1 will give Equation(4–8).

To conclude we are going to list several identities that could be computed with the help of this command (note that these identities could have also be computed using the methods presented in the previous sections): (4–9) n=1(15)nS1(n)(n+1)!=25h64,(4–9) (4–10) n=1(15)nS2(n)(n+1)!=875h6248+125125h62+125h716+125h88,(4–10) (4–11) n=1(12)nS2,2,2(n)(n+1)!=2π61899ζ32415l2ζ52,(4–11) (4–12) n=1(12)nS2,2(n)(n+2)!=2π29+π4458l223ζ32l2ζ3,(4–12) (4–13) n=1(12)nS2,2(n)n(n+2)!=π292π445+4l223+ζ32+4l2ζ3+15ζ516,(4–13) (4–14) n=1(13)nS2,2(n)(n+3)!=9320+33π320+51π2512+11π31283+91π45760+1377h11280271283πh1135π2h1128+243h264+27643πh2+1539h3128243h41627l3320+1533πl31280+11π3l31283271283πh1l3+243h2l3641377l32256081ζ364+39643πζ381l3ζ364.(4–14)

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank C. Schneider for useful discussions.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grant SFB F50 (F5009-N15), by the strategic program “Innovatives OÖ 2020” by the Upper Austrian Government and by the bilateral project DNTS-Austria 01/3/2017 (WTZ BG 03/2017), funded by Bulgarian National Science Fund and OeAD (Austria).

Notes

1 The package HarmonicSums (Version 1.0 16/05/19) together with a Mathematica notebook containing a list of illustrative examples can be downloaded at http://www.risc.jku.at/research/combinat/software/HarmonicSums.

References

  • [Ablinger 17] J. Ablinger. “Discovering and Proving Infinite Binomial Sums Identities.” J. Exp. Math. 26:1 (2017), 62–71. arXiv: 1507.01703
  • [Ablinger 17a] J. Ablinger. “Computing the Inverse Mellin Transform of Holonomic Sequences using Kovacic’s Algorithm.” In PoS RADCOR2017, 069, 2017. arXiv: 1801.01039
  • [Ablinger 16] J. Ablinger. “Inverse Mellin Transform of Holonomic Sequences.” PoS LL. 067 (2016), 2016. arXiv: 1606.02845
  • [Ablinger 14] J. Ablinger. “The Package HarmonicSums: Computer Algebra and Analytic Aspects of Nested Sums.” In Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory – LL, 2014. arXiv: 1407.6180
  • [Ablinger and Blümlein 13] J. Ablinger, and J. Blümlein. “Harmonic Sums, Polylogarithms, Special Numbers, and their Generalizations.” In Computer Algebra in Quantum Field Theory: Integration, Summation and Special Functions, Texts & Monographs in Symbolic Computation, edited by C. Schneider and J. Blümlein, pp. 132. Wien: Springer, 2013. arXiv: 1304.7071
  • [Ablinger et al. 13] J. Ablinger, J. Blümlein, and C. Schneider. “Analytic and Algorithmic Aspects of Generalized Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms.” J. Math. Phys. 54:8 (2013), 082301. arXiv: 1302.0378
  • [Ablinger et al. 14] J. Ablinger, J. Blümlein, and C. Schneider. “Generalized Harmonic, Cyclotomic, and Binomial Sums, their Polylogarithms and Special Numbers.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 523:1 (2014), 012060. arXiv: 1310.5645
  • [Ablinger 2013] J. Ablinger. “Computer Algebra Algorithms for Special Functions in Particle Physics.” PhD diss., Johannes Kepler University Linz, 2013. arXiv: 1310.0687.
  • [Ablinger et al. 14a] J. Ablinger, J. Blümlein, C. G. Raab, and C. Schneider. “Iterated Binomial Sums and their Associated Iterated Integrals.” J. Math. Phys. Comput. 55:11 (2014), 1–57. arXiv: 1407.1822
  • [Ablinger et al. 11] J. Ablinger, J. Blümlein, and C. Schneider. “Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms Generated by Cyclotomic Polynomials.” J. Math. Phys. 52:10 (2011), 102301. arXiv: 1105.6063
  • [Abramov and Petkovšek 94] S. A. Abramov and M. Petkovšek. “D’Alembertian Solutions of Linear Differential and Difference Equations.” In proceedings of ISSAC’94, ACM Press, 1994.
  • [Baker 66] A. Baker. “Linear Forms in the Logarithms of Algebraic Numbers.” I. Mathematika. 13:2 (1966), 204–216. D60 014018,
  • [Blümlein and Kurth 99] J. Blümlein and S. Kurth. “Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms up to Two-loop Order.” Phys. Rev D 60:1 (1999), 014018. arXiv: hep-ph/9810241v2
  • [Blümlein 00] J. Blümlein. “Analytic Continuation of Mellin Transforms up to Two-loop Order.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 133:1 (2000), 76–104. arXiv: 0003100
  • [Blümlein et al. 10] J. Blümlein, D. J. Broadhurst, and J. A. M. Vermaseren. “The Multiple Zeta Value Data Mine.” Comput. Phys. Commun. 181:3 (2010), 582–625. arXiv: math-ph/0907.2557
  • [Borwein and Borwein 87] J. M. Borwein and P. B. Borwein. Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity. New York: Wiley, 1987. Reprinted 1998.
  • [Borwein et al. 01] J. M. Borwein, D. J. Broadhurst, and J. Kamnitzer. “Central Binomial Sums, Multiple Clausen Values, and Zeta Values.” Exp. Math. 10:1 (2001), 25–34. arXiv: hep-th/0004153
  • [Borwein and Lisoněk 00] J. M. Borwein and P. Lisoněk. “Applications of Integer Relation Algorithms.” Discrete Math. 217:1–3 (2000), 65–82.
  • [Bronstein 92] M. Bronstein. “Linear Ordinary Differential Equations: Breaking through the Order 2 Barrier.” In proceedings of ISSAC’92, ACM Press, 1992.
  • [Davydychev and Kalmykov 01] A. I. Davydychev and M. Y. Kalmykov. “New Results for the Epsilon-expansion of Certain One-, Two- and Three-loop Feynman Diagrams.” Nucl. Phys. B. 605:1–3 (2001), 266–318. arXiv: hep-th/0012189
  • [Davydychev and Kalmykov 04] A. I. Davydychev and M. Y. Kalmykov. “Massive Feynman Diagrams and Inverse Binomial Sums.” Nucl. Phys. B. 699:1–2 (2004), 3–64. arXiv: hep-th/0303162
  • [Fleischer et al. 99] J. Fleischer, A. V. Kotikov, and O. L. Veretin. “Analytic Two Loop Results for Selfenergy Type and Vertex Type Diagrams with One Nonzero Mass.” Nucl. Phys. B. 547:1–2 (1999), 343–374. arXiv: hep-ph/9808242
  • [Jegerlehner et al. 03] F. Jegerlehner, M. Y. Kalmykov, and O. Veretin. “MS Versus Pole MasseSs of Gauge Bosons II: Two-Loop Electroweak Fermion Corrections.” Nucl. Phys. B. 658:1-2 (2003), 49–112. arXiv: hep-ph/0212319
  • [Kalmykov and Veretin 00] M. Y. Kalmykov and O. Veretin. “Single Scale Diagrams and Multiple Binomial Sums.” Phys. Lett. B. 483:1–3 (2000), 315–323. arXiv: hep-th/0004010
  • [Kalmykov et al. 07] M. Y. Kalmykov, B. F. L. Ward, and S. A. Yost. “Multiple (Inverse) Binomial Sums of Arbitrary Weight and Depth and the All-order ε-expansion of Generalized Hypergeometric Functions with One Half-integer Value of Parameter.” J. High Energy Phys. 2007:10 (2007), 048. arXiv: 0707.3654
  • [Kauers and Paule 11] M. Kauers and P. Paule. The Concrete Tetrahedron, Text and Monographs in Symbolic Computation. Wien: Springer, 2011.
  • [Kovacic 86] J. J. Kovacic. “An Algorithm for Solving Second Order Linear Homogeneous Differential Equations.” J. Symbolic Comput. 2:1 (1986), 3–43.
  • [Lehmer 85] D. H. Lehmer. “Interesting Series Involving the Central Binomial Coefficient.” Amer. Math. Monthly 92:7 (1985), 449–457.
  • [Liu and Wang 19] H. Liu and W. Wang. “Gauss’s Theorem and Harmonic Number Summation Formulae with Certain Mathematical Constants.” J. Difference Equations Appl. 25:3 (2019), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2019.1572127
  • [Ogreid and Osland 98] O. M. Ogreid and P. Osland. “Summing One-dimensional and Two-dimensional Series related to the Euler Series.” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 98:2 (1998), 245–271. arXiv: hep-th/9801168
  • [Petkovšek 92] M. Petkovšek. “Hypergeometric Solutions of Linear Recurrences with Polynomial Coefficients.” J. Symbolic Comput. 14:2–3 (1992), 243–264
  • [Remiddi and Vermaseren 00] E. Remiddi and J. A. M. Vermaseren. “Harmonic Polylogarithms.” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A. 15:05 (2000), 725–754. arXiv: hep-ph/9905237
  • [Hendriks and Singer 99] P. A. Hendriks and M. F. Singer. “Solving Difference Equations in Finite Terms.” J. Symbolic Comput. 27:3 (1999), 239–259.
  • [Vermaseren 99] J. A. M. Vermaseren. “Harmonic Sums, Mellin Transforms and Integrals.” Int. J. Mod. Phys A. 14:13 (1999), 2037–2076. arXiv: 9806280v1
  • [Weinzierl 04] S. Weinzierl. “Expansion Around Half Integer Values, Binomial Sums and Inverse Binomial Sums.” J. Math. Phys. 45:7 (2004), 2656–2673. arXiv: hep-ph/0402131
  • [Zhi-Wei 11] S. Zhi-Wei. “List of Conjectural Series for Powers of π and Other Constants.” 2011. arXiv: 1102. 5649.
  • [Zucker 85] I. J. Zucker. “On the Series ∑k=1∞(2kk)−1k−n and Related Sums.” J. Number Theory. 20 (1985), 92–102.