Abstract
We present three “hard” diagrams of the unknot. They require (at least) three extra crossings before they can be simplified to the trivial unknot diagram via Reidemeister moves in . Two of them are constructed by applying previously proposed methods. The proof of their hardness uses significant computational resources. We also determine that no small “standard” example of a hard unknot diagram requires more than one extra crossing for Reidemeister moves in
.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dagstuhl and the organizers of the Dagstuhl seminar 19352: “Computation in Low-Dimensional Geometry and Topology” where this work has been initiated.
Notes
1 Note that this definition of a knot diagram may not be considered as standard. In many settings the target of the projection is the plane rather than its one-point compactification
; this is more intuitive when drawing a diagram by hand. We focus on knot diagrams in the 2-sphere because it is more natural from an algorithmic point of view.
2 Our third hard unknot diagram PZ78 was discovered by simplifying the unknot diagram from [Citation18, ]. It shares some characteristics with D28, but is not discussed in further detail in this article.
3 Note that braids with high topological entropy per generator have also been used by Hass, Snoeyink and Thurston [Citation12] in order to provide hard unknots, but for a notion of hardness very different to ours (the size of the smallest piecewise-linear spanning disk).
4 all drawings of the section are generated with SnapPy’s Spherogram and PLink modules [Citation3].