61
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Orbits on K3 Surfaces of Markoff Type

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Published online: 03 Aug 2023
 

Abstract

Let WP1×P1×P1 be a surface given by the vanishing of a (2, 2, 2)-form. These surfaces admit three involutions coming from the three projections WP1×P1, so we call them tri-involutive K3 (TIK3) surfaces. By analogy with the classical Markoff equation, we say that W is of Markoff type (MK3) if it is symmetric in its three coordinates and invariant under double sign changes. An MK3 surface admits a group of automorphisms G generated by the three involutions, coordinate permutations, and sign changes. In this paper we study the G-orbit structure of points on TIK3 and MK3 surfaces. Over finite fields, we study fibral connectivity and the existence of large orbits, analogous to work of Bourgain, Gamburd, Sarnak and others for the classical Markoff equation. For a particular 1-parameter family of MK3 surfaces Wk, we compute the full G-orbit structure of Wk(Fp) for all primes p113, and we use this data as a guide to find many finite G-orbits in Wk(C), including a family of orbits of size 288 parameterized by a curve of genus 9.

2010 AMS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Philip Boalch, Wei Ho, Ram Murty, and Igor Shparlinski for their helpful advice and Peter Sarnak for his encouragement. We also thank the referees for their very careful reading and many helpful suggestions that greatly improved the paper. Calculations in this article were done using Magma [Citation8] and GP-PARI [Citation31].

Notes

1 We remark that although the generic member of the family of surfaces given by the vanishing of a (2, 2, 2)-form is a K3 surface, there are special members that for not. For example, the classical Markoff equation defines a rational surface.

2 See Definition 3.1, but briefly, non-degeneracy means that the three involutions are well-defined.

3 For the Cayley cubic M1,4, the points (2,t,t) for positive integers t generate distinct orbits, and their union is M1,4(Z).

4 We recall that an algebraic K3 surface is a smooth projective geometrically connected surface with trivial canonical bundle and irregularity zero. In this paper we work directly with equations of the form (6) satisfying the non-degeneracy condition, so it not important for our purposes that our surfaces are K3. However, for completeness, we show in Section B that minimal regular models of generic surfaces in our families are K3 surfaces.

5 In general, an (a, b, c)-form is a global section to O(P1)3(a,b,c), or more prosaically, an (a, b, c)-form is a polynomial f in K[X1,X2;Y1,Y2;Z1,Z2] satisfying f(uX1,uX2;vY1,vY2;wZ1,Zw2)=uavbwcf(X1,X2;Y1,Y2;Z1,Z2).

6 We note that π12,π13,π23 are finite if and only if their fibers are 0-dimensional, in which case they are maps of degree 2.

7 The reason that we do not use {φG:φ(F)=F}, which is the full subgroup that leaves F invariant, is because when using G to move around points in fibers of W, we will want to apply one generator at a time.

8 We do not include the set of generators Gen(G) in the notation for the fibral automorphism groups, since it will generally be clear from context. For example, for a generic TIK3 surface, we take Gen(G)={σ1,σ2,σ3}. If W has extra symmetries, for example if W is one of the MK3 surfaces described in Section 6, then Gen(G) will also include some coordinate permutations and sign shifts.

9 We recall that although we write F using affine coordinates to ease notation, in our calculations it always represents a (2, 2, 2) form. In particular, the polynomial F(x0,y0,z) denotes a degree 2 homogeneous form in the variables Z1 and Z2; cf. Definition 3.2.

10 Lemma 5.6(a) contains a proof that if W is a non-degenerate TIK3 surface, then these algebraic sets are one-dimensional, although they need not be irreducible.

11 See Remark 5.7 for examples where Cy0,z0(1) is reducible.

12 We remark that (μ23)1S3 is isomorphic to S4, but for our applications the group G° appears more naturally as the semi-direct product.

13 We note that for MK3-surfaces, we take Gen(G) as described in (16), so Γ-connectivity of fibers on MK3-surfaces may employ coordinate permutations and sign changes, as well as the usual σi automorphisms.

14 If we also allow the δ-inversion involutions described in Remark 8.7, then the 4 singular points form a single orbit.

15 Note that we’re really working in P1, so we formally set 01= and 1=0.

16 Indeed, this is true in the ring Z[21,x,y,z,k].

17 We note that β=0 gives the contradiction 1=0, while β=1 yields k = – 4 and an orbit with fewer than 64 elements.

18 We use the convenient notation v[j] to denote the jth coordinate of the vector v.

19 Somewhat surprisingly, for this example we find that Gσ·P1=G·P1=Ĝ°Gσ·P1 in W13(F71).

20 We have listed more generators than needed. For example, σ3=τ23°σ2°τ23, so Aut(Wx0(1))=σ2,τ23,ϵ23, and similarly for the other fibers.

Additional information

Funding

Silverman’s research supported by Simons Collaboration Grant #712332.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 360.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.