Abstract
The article applies generalized gravity models to analyze Bangladesh's bilateral trade pattern using the panel data estimation technique. The results reveal that Bangladesh's trade is positively determined by the size of the economies, per capita gross domestic product differential and openness of the trading countries. Bangladesh's exports are positively determined by its income, partner countries' total import demand and openness, but negatively determined by partner countries' income and domestic inflation. Bangladesh's imports are positively determined by income of trading countries and degree of openness of the partner countries and negatively determined by partner countries' inflation. Transportation costs affect Bangladesh's trade negatively.
Notes
2. Empirical research works that have applied gravity model include CitationBergstrand (1985, Citation1989), CitationKoo and Karemera (1991), CitationLe, Nguyen, & Bandara (1996), CitationFrankel (1997), CitationRajapakse and Arunatilake (1997), CitationSharma and Chua (2000); CitationJakab, Kovacs, & Oszlay (2001); CitationSoloaga and Winters (2001), CitationChristie (2001), CitationMátyás, Konya, & Harris (2000), CitationBatra (2006), and others.
3. Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka have formally established the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) in December 1985. Recently Afghanistan has also joined the Association.
4. SAARC: Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka; ASEAN: Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand; NAFTA: Canada, Mexico, and United States; EU: Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; Middle East: Egypt, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Syrian Arab Republic, and the United Arab Emirates; Other: Australia, New Zealand, Japan, China, and Hong Kong.
5. Explanatory variables are selected on the basis of past literature and economic implications that affect trade. Trade tax/tariff may be considered as an important explanatory variable, but data on trade tax are not available for most of the sample countries, and data on tariff are not available at all.
6. Results are not shown. However, these can be provided upon request.
7. The results of autocorrelated error structured models, multicollinearity tests, robustness tests of variables, descriptive statistics, and correlation matrices are not shown. However, these can be provided upon request.
Tinbergen
,
J.
1962
.
Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy
,
New York
,
NY
:
The Twentieth Century Fund
.
Anderson
,
J. E.
1979
.
A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation
.
American Economic Review
,
69
:
106
–
116
.
Bergstrand
,
J. H.
1985
.
The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence
.
Review of Economics and Statistics
,
67
(
3
)
:
474
–
481
.
Bergstrand
,
J. H.
1989
.
The generalised gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor proportion theory in international trade
.
Review of Economics and Statistics
,
71
(
1
)
:
143
–
153
.
Helpman
,
E.
and
Krugman
,
P. R.
1985
.
Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing return, imperfect competition, and international economy
,
Cambridge
,
MA
:
The MIT Press
.
Eaton
,
J.
and
Kortum
,
S.
1997
.
Technology and bilateral trade (NBER Working Paper No. 6253)
,
Cambridge
,
MA
:
National Bureau of Economic Research
.
Deardorff
,
A.
1998
.
“
Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a classical world?
”
. In
The regionalization of the world economy
,
Edited by:
Frankel
,
J.
7
–
32
.
Chicago
,
IL
:
University of Chicago Press
.
Evenett
,
S. J.
and
Keller
,
W.
1998
.
On the theories explaining the success of the gravity equation (NBER Working Paper No. 6529)
,
Cambridge
,
MA
:
National Bureau of Economic Research
.
Haveman
,
J.
and
Hummels
,
D.
2004
.
Alternative hypotheses and the volume of trade: The gravity equation and the extent of specialization
.
Canadian Journal of Economics
,
37
(
1
)
:
199
–
218
.
Bergstrand
,
J. H.
1985
.
The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence
.
Review of Economics and Statistics
,
67
(
3
)
:
474
–
481
.
Bergstrand
,
J. H.
1989
.
The generalised gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor proportion theory in international trade
.
Review of Economics and Statistics
,
71
(
1
)
:
143
–
153
.
Koo
,
W. W.
and
Karemera
,
D.
1991
.
Determinants of world wheat trade flows and policy analysis
.
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics
,
39
:
439
–
455
.
Le
,
Q. P.
,
Nguyen
,
D.
and
Bandara
,
J. S
.
1996
.
Vietnam's foreign trade in the context of ASEAN and Asia-Pacific region: A gravity approach
.
ASEAN Economic Bulletin
,
13
(
2
)
:
185
–
199
.
Frankel
,
J. A.
1997
.
Regional trading blocs in the world economic system
,
Washington
,
DC
:
Institute for International Economics
.
Rajapakse
,
P.
and
Arunatilake
,
N.
1997
.
Would a reduction in trade barriers promote intra-SAARC trade?: A Sri Lankan perspective
.
Journal of Asian Economics
,
81
:
95
–
115
.
Sharma
,
S. C.
and
Chua
,
S. Y.
2000
.
ASEAN: Economic integration and intra-regional trade
.
Applied Economics Letters
,
7
(
3
)
:
165
–
169
.
Jakab
,
Z. M.
,
Kovacs
,
M. A.
and
Oszlay
,
A
.
2001
.
How far has trade integration advanced?: An analysis of the actual and potential trade of three Central and Eastern European countries
.
Journal of Comparative Economics
,
29
:
276
–
292
.
Soloaga
,
I.
and
Winters
,
L. A.
2001
.
How has regionalism in the nineties affected trade?
.
North American Journal of Economics and Finance
,
12
:
1
–
29
.
Mátyás
,
L.
,
Konya
,
L.
and
Harris
,
M. N
.
2000
.
Modelling export activity of eleven APEC countries (Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 5/00)
,
Melbourne
,
, Australia
:
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research
.
Batra
,
A.
2006
.
India's global trade potential: The gravity model approach
.
Global Economic Review
,
35
(
3
)
:
327
–
361
.