Abstract
The article discusses the use of various institutions of scientific imperialism, including the institution of publishing academic articles in English, the institution of standardizing how research should be reported, and the institution of indexing of articles in two global databases. We show that the establishment of institutions of scientific imperialism entails a number of negative trends: slowing down the publication of articles, the loss of a national research culture, and formulating and presenting research results to fit the requirements of indexing databases. We identify possible approaches to mitigate the negative effects associated with the expansion of the institutions of scientific imperialism.
Notes
1. See https://www.researchtrends.com.
2. Holcomb, Alex. Open-access science blog, https://alexholcombe.wordpress. com/2015/05/21/scholarly-publisher-profit-update/.
3. Current Contents Connect, the official website of Thomson Reuters, http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/schoIarly-search-and-discovery/current-contents-connect.html.
4. Web of Science, the official website of Thomson Reuters, http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/web-of-science.html.
5. Scopus, https://www.scopus.com/home.url.
6. Google Scholar, https://scholar.google.ru.
7. Elibrary.ru website, http://elibrary.ru/elibrary_about.asp.