Presidential Elections in Russia: Opportunities and Limitations of Electoral Consolidation

ABSTRACT

This article analyzes the processes of electoral consolidation around incumbents, as well as around opposition candidates, in Russian presidential elections. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the parliamentary and presidential campaigns over six electoral cycles, the author identifies shifts in the turnout and voting patterns for candidates in presidential elections in comparison to the previous State Duma elections. His research shows that almost all viable candidates in presidential elections rely on the electorate of a certain party—usually the one that nominates the candidate (the only important exception to this rule was the vote for P. Grudinin in the 2018 election). The study also shows that an increase in turnout in presidential elections plays into the hands of the incumbent (except for B. Yeltsin in 1996), although in some cases it can boost support for a strong opposition candidate (G. Zyuganov in 1996) or an entirely new candidate (M. Prokhorov in 2012). Having compared voting patterns between parliamentary and presidential elections, the author comes to the conclusion that an incumbent is usually able to win over ambivalent voters and, depending on the political context, voters from various party clusters; for example, supporters of A Just Russia, LDPR, liberal parties, and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (at the level of certain regions). Opposition candidates possess much more limited opportunities for this kind of consolidation or lack them altogether. The author interprets these trends as a manifestation of strategic voting based on voters’ rational choice in favor of the incumbent. 

English translation © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, from the Russian text © 2018 “Politiia.” “Prezidentskie vybory v Rossii: Vozmozhnosti i predely elektoral’noi konsolidatsii,” Politiia, 2018, no. 2(89), pp. 23-50.

Rostislav Feliksovich Turovsky is a doctor of political science and a professor in the School of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.

Translated by Lucy Gunderson. Translation reprinted from Russian Politics and Law, vol. 56, nos. 3-6. DOI:10.1080/10611940.2019.1784629.

This article is the republished version of:

Presidential Elections in Russia: Opportunities and Limitations of Electoral Consolidation

Acknowledgments

This article uses the results of the project “Impact of Institutional Factors on the Regional Structure of Russia’s Party System,” which was conducted as part of the Basic Research Program of the Higher School of Economics in 2017. The author thanks Ekaterina Solov’eva, an undergraduate student in political science at the HSE, for her assistance in conducting this study.

Notes

English translation © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, from the Russian text © 2018 “Politiia.” “Prezidentskie vybory v Rossii: Vozmozhnosti i predely elektoral’noi konsolidatsii,” Politiia, 2018, no. 2(89), pp. 23-50.

Rostislav Feliksovich Turovsky is a doctor of political science and a professor in the School of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, of the National Research University Higher School of Economics.

Translated by Lucy Gunderson. Translation reprinted from Russian Politics and Law, vol. 56, nos. 3-6. DOI:10.1080/10611940.2019.1784629.

1. [Numbering differs from the original Russian version]. From here on, we will use the term “incumbent” to refer to both “incumbent” and “successor.”

2. See, for example, Ferrara, Herron, and Nishikawa (2005).

3. Hermann and Pappi (2008).

4. On the influence of election type on voter behavior, see Turovksy and Sukhova (2017).