U.S. Policy in the South China Sea During the Presidency of D. Trump

ABSTRACT

This article analyzes U.S. policy in the South China Sea (SCS) during the presidency of D. Trump and examines American strategic interests, objectives, and missions in the region. It explores U.S. policy in the context of the “Indo-Pacific strategy” that became the doctrinal basis of the Trump administration’s policy course in the Asia-Pacific Region (APAC). It takes note of the new level of adversarial relations between the United States and China, which has posed a serious challenge to American military dominion in the SCS and the APAC region. In recent years the United States has significantly increased the scale and frequency of naval maneuvers in the South China Sea. It was under the Trump administration that the United States began actively to recruit its allies, including from outside region, for joint operations in the SCM. Particular attention is devoted to the so-called Freedom of Navigation Operations that the U.S. Navy conducts in the disputed waters. These operations have a dual purpose: On the one hand, they are positioned as peacemaking operations intended solely to protect freedom of navigation; on the other, they are the United States’ principal tool for containing Chinese military ambitions, thereby leading to heightened tensions in the region.

KEYWORDS:

• Asian-Pacific Region
• South China Sea; U.S. foreign policy
• PRC
• Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOP)
• Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD)

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Mosiakov, D.V. “Iuzhno-Kitaiskoe more: perekhod konflikta regional’nogo v konflikt global’nyi.”

2. “How much trade transits in the South China Sea?” China Power.

3. “World oil transit chokepoints critical to global energy security.” The U.S. Energy Information Administration. December 1, 2014.

4. “Malacca Straits VLCC traffic doubles in a decade as shipping traffic hits all-time high in 2017,” Seatrade Maritime News, February 19, 2018.

5. Svanstrom, N. Conflict management and negotiations in South China Sea: The ASEAN Way?

6. Quoted from: Lokshin, G.M. Iuzhno-Kitaiskoe more: trudnyi poisk soglasiia.

7. Ibid.

8. McDevitt, M. “The South China Sea: Assessing U.S. Policy and Options for the Future.” A Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) Occasional Paper.

9. Remarks at Press Availability, Secretary Clinton, July 23, 2010. Secretary Clinton’s speech from the National Convention Center in Hanoi.

10. Ibid.

11. Kerry, J. “U.S. Vision for Asia-Pacific engagement.” U.S. Department of State. August, 13, 2014.

12. Yoon, S. “Implications of Xi Jinping’s ”True Maritime Power”: Its context, significance, and impact on the region,” Naval War College Review, V. 68, No. 3, 2015.

13 Lebedeva, N.V. “Bol’shoi Indiiskii okean i kitaiskaia strategiia ‘Nit’ zhemchuga’,” Aziia i Afrika segodnia, 2011, No. 9, pp. 6–13.

14. Komissina, I.N. “Morskoi Shelkovyi put’ XXI v. – global’nyi geopoliticheskii proekt Kitaia,” Problemy natsional’noi strategii, 2017, No. 1, pp. 60–81.

15. Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet Australian Strategic Policy Institute Canberra, Australia. Admiral Harry B. Harris Jr. March 31, 2015.

16. Konventsiia Organizatsii Ob”edinennykh Natsii po morskomu pravu, 10 dekabria 1982. Ch. VIII, St. 121, S. 88.

17. Stepanov, A.S. “Rost voennoi moshchi Kitaia v nachale XXI veka: znachenie dlia SShA.” In Rossiia i Amerika v XXI veke, 2018, Vyp. 3.

18. Batiuk, V.I. “Vozmozhnyi amerikano-kitaiskii voennyi konflikt v otsenkakh amerikanskikh voennykh spetsialistov.” In Rossiia i Amerika v XXI veke, 2017, Vyp. 1.

19. “New China carrier makes waves in South China Sea,” Asia Times, December 18, 2019.

20. Kashin, V.B. “Pereryv podkhodit k kontsu? Voennaia strategiia Kitaia na sovremennom etape,” Rossiia v global’noi politike, 2018, No. 6.

21. “China’s National Defense in the New Era.” Ministry of National Defense of The People’s Republic of China. July 24, 2019.

22. Ibid.

23. “Read Donald Trump’s ‘America First’ foreign policy speech,” Time, April 27, 2016.

24. “Cardin, Corker, colleagues write to Trump about U.S. navigation operations in South China Sea.” United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. May 10, 2017.

25. “National Security Strategy of the United States of America.” Washington D.C.: The White House, December 2017.

26. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2019.—Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, 2019. URL: https://media.defense.gov/ 2019/May/02/2002127082/-1/-1/1/2019_CHINA_MILITARY_POWER_REPORT.pdf.

27. Gudev, P.A. “Politiko-pravovye aspekty morskoi politiki SShA v ATR,” Iugo-Vostochnaia Aziia: aktual’nye problemy razvitiia, 2019, No. 1, p. 53.

28. Gudev, P.A. “Politika SShA v mirovom okeane,” Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2016, T. 14, No. 1, pp. 107.

29. See, e.g., Cooper, Z., and G. Poling. “America’s Freedom of Navigations Are Lost at Sea,” Foreign Policy, January 8, 2019; Valencia, M.J. “US FONOPs in the South China Sea: intent, effectiveness and necessity,” The Diplomat, July 11, 2017.

30. Liu, Zh. “France, Britain to sail warships in contested South China Sea to challenge Beijing,” South China Morning Post, June 4, 2018.

31. Heydarian, R. “Coalition of the willing builds in South China Sea,” Asia Times, June 19, 2019.

32. Bitzinger, R. “Is Trump finally getting an Asia policy?” Asia Times, May 27, 2019.

33 “U.S., Japan, India and Philippines challenge Beijing with naval drills in the South China Sea.” Reuters, May 9, 2019.