Publication Cover
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
An International Journal
Volume 20, 2007 - Issue 3
199
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Depth of processing and recall of threat material in fearful and nonfearful individuals

, &
Pages 223-237 | Published online: 08 Aug 2007
 

Abstract

Although many studies have examined the nature of memory distortions in anxious individuals, few have considered biases in specific memory processes, such as encoding or retrieval. To investigate whether the presentation of threat material facilitates encoding biases, spider fearful (n=63), blood fearful (n=73), and nonfearful (n=75) participants encoded spider related, blood related, and neutral words as a function of three levels of processing (i.e., structural, semantic, and self referent). Participants subsequently completed either a free recall or a recognition task. All participants demonstrated a partial depth of processing effect, such that they recalled more words encoded in the self referent condition than in the other two conditions, but groups did not differ in their recall of stimuli as a function of word type. Relative to participants in the other groups, spider fearful participants had fewer spider related intrusions in the recall condition, and they made fewer errors in responding to structural and semantic encoding questions when spider related words were presented. These results contribute to an increasingly large body of literature suggesting that anxious individuals are not characterized by a memory bias toward threat, and they raise the possibility that individuals with spider fears process threat-relevant information differently than individuals with blood fears.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper and Dr Thomas Tenhave for his statistical advice.

Notes

1. Watts and Sharrock (Citation1984) provided evidence of the SPQ's factor structure and excellent concurrent validity. Marks and Mathews (Citation1979) reported a 1-week test–retest reliability of .96 for the blood/injury scale using a clinical sample with a variety of phobias. The coefficient alphas for these scales obtained on similar spider fearful, blood fearful, and nonfearful samples were .88 and .85, respectively (Wenzel et al., Citation2003).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Kimberlee Zetocha

Portions of this paper were presented in Kimberlee Zetocha's senior honors thesis

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 512.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.