ABSTRACT
Background & Objectives: Emotional reactivity to stress is associated with both mental and physical health and has been assumed to be a stable feature of the person. However, recent evidence suggests that the within-person association between stress and negative affect (i.e., affective stress-reactivity) may increase over time and in times of high stress, at least in older adult populations. The objective of the current study was to examine the across-time stability of stress-reactivity in a younger sample – emerging adulthood – and examine neuroticism, overall stress, social support and life events as potential moderators of stability.
Design & Methods: Undergraduate students (N = 540, mean age = 18.76 years) participated in a measurement burst design, completing a 30-day daily diary annually for four years. Moderators were assessed once at every burst, while negative affect and stress were assessed daily via a secure website.
Results & Conclusions: Findings suggest a relatively high degree of rank-order and mean-level stability in stress-reactivity across the four years, and within-person changes in neuroticism and overall stress predicted concurrent shifts in stress-reactivity. Unlike older samples, there was no evidence of an overall linear change in stability over time, though there was significant variability in linear change trajectories.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1 The number of waves completed was higher among Caucasian (vs. others; r = .09, p < .05), females compared to makes (r = .16, p < .01), and participants with higher mean levels of daily stress (r = .09, p < .05) and higher mean levels of social support (r = .11, p < .01). Number of waves completed was lower among individuals with higher mean levels of daily negative mood (r = −.12, p < .01) and higher mean levels of negative life events (r = −.21, p < .01). Importantly, results indicated no association between the number of waves completed and stress-reactivity (b = 0.003, SE = .003, p = .404).
2 Models were re-estimated using listwise deletion and the results were substantively identical.
3 Pearson correlations were based on the listwise deleted sample of N = 309.