Publication Cover
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
An International Journal
Volume 37, 2024 - Issue 4
238
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Perceived stress moderates emotion regulation success in real-world contexts: an ecologically-valid multilevel investigation

, &
Pages 501-514 | Received 24 May 2022, Accepted 27 Oct 2023, Published online: 06 Nov 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Emotion regulation plays a crucial role in well-being in everyday life. Effective emotion regulation depends upon adaptively matching a given strategy to a given situation. Recent research has begun to explore these interactions in the context of daily reports of perceived stress, affect, and emotion regulation strategy usage. To further understand these differences in strategy efficacy in an ecologically valid context, we examined responses to real world stressors in a young adult sample.

Methods

We surveyed a range of emotion regulation strategies, including two forms of cognitive reappraisal (i.e., reinterpretation, which involves cognitively reframing one’s emotional responses, and psychological distancing, which involves adopting an objective, impartial perspective). Participants reported strategy usage, momentary perceived stress, and affect in response to multiple ecological momentary assessments over a period of 7 days.

Results

Analyses of links between strategy usage and affect revealed that rumination was significantly negatively associated with more positive affect ratings. Further, a significant interaction between momentary perceived stress and reinterpretation usage was observed on affect, such that reinterpretation was more adaptive during situations perceived as less stressful.

Conclusion

These results provide further insight into the importance of situational context in determining the effectiveness of particular emotion regulation strategies.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Madison Miller, Christopher Almendariz, and Alyssa Balandran for their assistance with data collection.

Data availability statement

Data are available on the Open-Science Framework (OSF) at the following link: https://osf.io/y4mkj/?view_only = a9e89266146e4b49a3e3f295399ff2f8

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 512.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.