394
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
18th International Conference on QSAR in Environmental and Health Sciences (QSAR 2018)

A large comparison of integrated SAR/QSAR models of the Ames test for mutagenicity$

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 591-611 | Received 14 Jun 2018, Accepted 03 Jul 2018, Published online: 27 Jul 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Results from the Ames test are the first outcome considered to assess the possible mutagenicity of substances. Many QSAR models and structural alerts are available to predict this endpoint. From a regulatory point of view, the recommendation from international authorities is to consider the predictions of more than one model and to combine results in order to develop conclusions about the mutagenicity risk posed by chemicals. However, the results of those models are often conflicting, and the existing inconsistency in the predictions requires intelligent strategies to integrate them. In our study, we evaluated different strategies for combining results of models for Ames mutagenicity, starting from a set of 10 diverse individual models, each built on a dataset of around 6000 compounds. The novelty of our study is that we collected a much larger set of about 18,000 compounds and used the new data to build a family of integrated models. These integrations used probabilistic approaches, decision theory, machine learning, and voting strategies in the integration scheme. Results are discussed considering balanced or conservative perspectives, regarding the possible uses for different purposes, including screening of large collection of substances for prioritization.

Acknowledgements

The research at Swetox (UN) was supported by Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [2013.0253] and Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2016-02031].

The authors from Mario Negri and Kode kindly acknowledge the Projects JANUS and the LIFE VERMEER project (LIFE16 ENV/IT/000167) for financial support.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the EU LIFE VERMEER project [(LIFE16 ENV/IT/000167)]; UBA, Germany [Projects JANUS]; Swedish Research Council FORMAS [[2016-02031]]; Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [[2013.0253]].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 543.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.