Abstract
The rapid expansion of bike-share systems worldwide has been praised as a sign of the environmental movement, with positive consequences for transportation, the economy, and health in urban areas. But is it really possible that politicians, information-technology companies, and global players such as banks and advertising firms have suddenly joined the ranks of those advocating bicycle use for the sake of the environment and a better quality of life in cities? Bike-share systems, like any other artifact, are a technological assemblage formed by technical, cultural, economic, and social factors and actors. When this assemblage stabilizes and is socially accepted, debate cools down and some unresolved features are put aside. We argue that disassembly of the bike-share system, highlighting the use of electronic keys, credit cards, and the strategic location of docks in upmarket urban areas, may enable us to unveil some of its features and reveal a more complex sociotechnical assemblage.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Christopher Zegras, at MIT, for his comments on the first draft of this paper.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Note on Contributor
Fábio Duarte is a professor of urban management at Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, and visiting scholar in the Senseable City Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
ORCID
Fábio Duarte http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-5379
Notes
1. See Bank ON DC, by Capital Bikes, in Washington DC, http://www.capitalbikeshare.com/bankondc
2. See Hubway Data Visualization Challenge, http://hubwaydatachallenge.org, and the global bike share map with real-time data: http://bikes.oobrien.com/global.php
3. For a map with Chicago BSS stations and income, see http://geocommons.com/maps/266797
4. Follow the running story about the struggles to expand NY BSS at http://www.streetsblog.org/category/issues-campaigns/bike-sharing/