122
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 198-203 | Received 14 Mar 2022, Accepted 07 Sep 2022, Published online: 16 Sep 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Background

The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section.

Methods

Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n = 284; RA, n = 249).

Results

Higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower levels of pulse oximetry were found for GEA in contrast to RA (p < 0.001). The application of RA presented less side-effects (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

RA for cesarean section should be preferred when balancing the risks and benefits for the mother and fetus.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.