Erratum

This article refers to:

Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America

Article title: “Environmental Safety of the Use of Major

Surfactant Classes in North America”

Authors: Christina Cowan-Ellsberry, Scott Belanger, Philip Dorn, Scott Dyer, Drew McAvoy, Hans Sanderson, Donald Versteeg, Darci Ferrer, and Kathleen Stanton

Journal: Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology

Bibliometrics: Volume 47, Issue 17, pages 1893-1993

DOI: 10.1080/10739149.2013.803777

In the heading for Table 8, an extra character was introduced during editing. The entire, corrected Table 8 appears below.

The publisher apologizes for this error.

Table 1 Monitoring data and removal values for long-chain alcohols in U.S. wastewater treatment; data for n ≥ 3 plants shown as mean ± SD; data for n = 2 plants shown as mean (range)

Treatment	Number	Influent	Final	Final
type	of plants	(mg/L)	effluent (mg/L)	removal (%)
AST	3	0.644 ± 0.559	0.00029 ± 0.00025	99.9 ± 0.14^1
AST	2	0.149 (0.092–0.205)	0.00022 (0.00022–0.00022)	99.8 (99.8–99.9)^2
TFT	2	0.516 (0.499–0.532)	0.0035 (0.0020–0.0049)	99.3 (99.1–99.6)^2
RBCT	1	0.157	0.00006	99.9^2
ODT	2	0.476 (0.249–0.702)	0.00053 (0.00031–0.00074)	99.8 (99.7–99.9)^2
LT	2	0.182 (0.067–0.297)	0.0015 (0.0011–0.0020)	98.8 (98.4–99.3)^2

AST, activated sludge treatment; TFT, trickling filter treatment; RBCT, rotating biological contractor treatment; ODT, oxidation ditch treatment; LT, lagoon treatment.¹MRI (2004), ²Morrall et al. (2006).