Abstract
The use of psychoactive drugs appears to have a clear influence on both friendship formation and friendship quality. Differences in the frequency of substance use are particularly likely to influence each friend’s perceptions of their relationship with the other. However, the impact of divergent substance use patterns within a friendship dyad on overall friendship quality remains an underexplored area. Self-reported alcohol use and perceptions of friendship quality data were collected from 2,154 students (mean age = 19.3) in 1,077 friendship dyads. Analyses of variance were conducted to determine (a) if friends who have similar alcohol use patterns perceive greater friendship quality than friends with dissimilar use patterns, and (b) how dissimilarities in drinking behaviors between friends affect individuals’ perceptions of friendship quality. Individuals in dyads comprised of friends with similar drinking patterns were found to experience higher quality relationships than those in friendships with dissimilar drinking patterns. Partners who drank less frequently in dissimilar friendships did not perceive the friendship to be of significantly lower quality than did their more frequently drinking peers. Interestingly, high-rate heavy episodic drinkers reported a significantly higher overall friendship quality when their peer was a low-rate heavy episodic drinker as opposed to a non-heavy episodic drinker. Since high-rate drinkers perceived higher friendship quality to low-frequency drinkers than non-heavy episodic drinkers, they likely place more value in the opinions of low-rate drinkers. Abstinence-based alcohol intervention programs may utilize this information in efforts to decrease early dropout rates.
Notes
Due to developing concerns that the term binge drinking is ambiguous, we refer to imbibing several alcoholic drinks in one short period of time as “heavy episodic drinking” rather than “binge drinking.”
We utilize a “five or more drinks in one setting” measure for both genders since the survey utilized does not contain alternative measures for binge drinking. While many studies utilize a “five drinks for males” and “four drinks for females” indicator of heavy episodic drinking (see Wechsler & Nelson, Citation2001), the survey did not include different items for males and females. It similarly did not include an episodic drinking measure that accounted for body mass or drinking episode duration (see Lange & Voas, Citation2001). Recent work, however, suggests that BAC measurement and other techniques may not be as capable as traditional measures (such as ours) at identifying risks related to short-term alcohol use (Fillmore & Jude, Citation2011). We suggest future research replicate the present analysis utilizing other measures of heavy episodic drinking to determine if the results are consistent regardless of how binge drinking is conceptualized.