4,136
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of immediate recall on eyewitness accuracy and susceptibility to misinformation

, &
Pages 619-634 | Received 31 Oct 2011, Accepted 13 Jul 2013, Published online: 15 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

Eyewitnesses can be influenced by misinformation that they encounter when discussing the event with a co-witness. Some studies have found that an immediate recall of the event can inoculate eyewitnesses against such misinformation; others have found that it increases susceptibility to misinformation. These different findings may be due to methodological factors, so the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different recall conditions. An immediate cued recall, free recall or no recall was given to 88 participants after they watched a crime video. They then discussed the video with a confederate who introduced correct and incorrect information about the video. Accuracy and amount of recall was tested one week later. It was found that the immediate-recall questionnaire did not make participants more susceptible to misinformation in comparison to no-recall participants, indeed the data trended the other way, suggesting that immediate-recall inoculated participants against misinformation. Furthermore, the provision of correct post-event information increased memory accuracy, especially after immediate recall.

Notes

1. This interaction was not significant on the final free-recall questionnaire (p = 0.66).

2. On the final free-recall questionnaire the contrast between cued recall and free recall was also significant (p < 0.05), suggesting that cued-recall participants had higher accurate recall.

3. On the final free-recall questionnaire there were no differences between the conditions on confabulations for correct post-event information (all ps > 0.50).

4. It is not appropriate to analyse these values using a 2 × (3) ANOVA because for each participant the values must sum to 1.0.

5. On the final free-recall questionnaire, no significant differences or contrasts were found (all ps > 0.083).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 199.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.