Publication Cover
Identities
Global Studies in Culture and Power
Volume 20, 2013 - Issue 2
397
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Indigenous land restitution and traditional occupation in Mexico's Lacandonia

Pages 149-171 | Received 21 Apr 2012, Published online: 07 Mar 2013
 

Abstract

The central argument of this article is that international (inter-American) human rights law upholds the land rights of the Lacandon Community (Comunidad Zona Lacandona). This argument relates to the issue of the recognition and protection of indigenous land rights on the basis of traditional tenure by international human rights law. The article contributes to the empirical understanding not only of the case study but also of the concepts of traditional occupation and land restitution in the context of the Inter-American Human Rights System. This article is based on data obtained from agrarian archives, interviews and a revision of the literature on the case study and the inter-American norms and jurisprudence.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Mexico's CONACYT for funding this research and Alexandra Tomaselli for her valuable comments.

Notes

1. These data have been interpreted in the light of a revision of the literature on the community's land restitution and the inter-American norms and jurisprudence on land restitution and traditional occupation.

2. Some studies on the Lacandons are E. Thompson. Citation1970. Maya History and Religion; F. Scholes and R. Roys. Citation1948. The Maya Chontal Indians of Acalan-Tixchel; N. Pons Saez. Citation1997. La Conquista del Lacandon; and D. Boremanse. Citation1998. Hach Winik. The Lacandon Maya of Chiapas, Southern Mexico.

3. Mexico's Article 27 of the 1917 Constitution established tenure principles for different land-based communities: ejido, agrarian colonies and agrarian communities (recipients of land restitution actions).

4. El Cedro, Lacanjá, Miramar, El Ocotal, Santa Clara, Petjá, Itzanocú, La Maroma and Metzabok.

5. Biosphere reserves (Montes Azules and Lacant-Tún) and protected natural areas (Chan-Kin, Najá, Metzabok, Yaxchilán and Bonampak).

6. See IACtHR H.R., Case of the Xákmok Kásek Indigenous Community vs. Paraguay. 2010; IACtHR H.R., Case of the Saramaka People vs. Suriname.2007; IACtHR H.R., Case of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community vs. Paraguay.2006; IACtHR H.R., Case of the Yakye Axa Indigenous Community vs. Paraguay. 2005; IACtHR H.R., Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community vs. Nicaragua. 2001.

7. Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, the United States, Suriname, Venezuela.

8. Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community vs. Nicaragua and Case of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community vs. Paraguay.

9. Also see International Court of Justice, Western Sahara case, ICJ Reports 1975.

10. The Lacandons refer to themselves as the Hach Winik, meaning the Real Men in their language.

11. The Indians of Yucum and Petenacte were spotted in 1700 in Lacandonia (De Vos Citation1980, p. 230).

12. Peljá, Metzabok, Arena, Santo Domingo, Chocolja, Lacanjá, Laguna Chan, El Cedro, El Desempeño and San Quintín.

13. Miramar Lagoon, Sic Rum and Ya'rirXa'n.

14. La Arena, Yukman Babar, Pasa Macho, Santo Domingo and Ilusión, also Najá, Het-já and Río Perlas located between Het-já and Tenosique.

15. Peljá, Metzabok, Arena, Santo Domingo, Chocoljá, Lacanjá, Laguna Chan, El Cedro, El Desempeño and San Quintín (Villa Rojas 1967).

16. For a discussion on the presence of the EZLN in Lacandonia, see Legorreta (Citation1998) and Orive and Torres (Citation2010).

17. There has been Lacandon presence since at least 1786 (De Vos Citation1980); there are also accounts of the existence of scattered settlements in the nineteenth century (Tozzer Citation1907, Duby Citation1944, Villa Rojas Citation1967b, Baer and Merrifield Citation1971, Blom and Duby Citation2006).

18. A group of 25 Lacandons from ‘Puerto Bello Metzaboc’ were granted 10,600,000 hectares of national lands through a Decree dated on 26 August 1967 – enforced until 1975 (AGA. Puerto Bello Mexaboc).

19. See the cases Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community vs. Nicaragua and Saramaka People vs. Suriname.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 179.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.