136
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the 10-meter ambulation test in hemiparesis is better barefoot at maximal speed

, , , , , & show all
Pages 345-350 | Received 19 Oct 2017, Accepted 31 Mar 2018, Published online: 17 Apr 2018
 

Abstract

Objectives Reliability of clinical tests to evaluate ambulation in chronic hemiparesis may vary according to the testing condition. The 10-meter ambulation test (AT10) assesses walking speed and step length over 10 m, starting and ending in seated position. In the present study, we compared the intra- and inter-reliability of AT10 in chronic hemiparesis in four different conditions: with shoes and barefoot, at free and maximal safe speed.

Methods Ten patients with hemiparesis, >1 year post-stroke (age 45 ± 12, time since stroke 16 ± 9 months, mean ± SD) participated in the reliability study (registration, ID-RCB-2017-A00090-53). All patients performed the AT10 twice, one week apart, in each of the four conditions. The number of steps and time to complete the task were manually recorded by four independent raters. The main outcome measurements were the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and mean raw differences (DIFF) of the three parameters of AT10 (speed, step length, and cadence) in each of the four conditions. Effects of wearing shoes and speed condition were explored using ANOVA.

Results Across all conditions, mean intra- and inter-rater ICCs were, respectively, 98.5 ± 0.1 and 99.9 ± 0.1% for speed, 98.3 ± 0.1 and 99.7 ± 0.2% for step length, and 96.5 ± 0.1 and 98.9 ± 0.6% for cadence. Mean intra- and inter-rater CV for speed were 0.051 ± 0.016 and 0.022 ± 0.002, respectively. Intra-rater reliability of speed assessments was higher at maximal than at free speed (ICC, CV, DIFF, p < 0.05). At free speed, intra-rater ICCs were higher barefoot than with shoes (p < 0.05).

Discussion Performing the 10-meter ambulation test barefoot at maximal speed optimizes its reliability.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the association Neuroloco for their support with conference fees to present the results of this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 114.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.