224
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Do functional hamstring to quadriceps ratio differ between men and women with and without stroke?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 554-560 | Received 01 Feb 2018, Accepted 07 Jul 2018, Published online: 30 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background: The functional hamstrings/quadriceps ratio (FH/Q) is useful to detect muscle imbalances after stroke. However, is necessary to investigate possible differences between men and women affected by stroke and controls.

Objectives: To compare the FH/Q between men and women with stroke and matched controls.

Method: Cross-sectional study. Fifty-six participants (10 men – MSTK and 18 women – WSTK with stroke; and 10 men – MCONT and 18 women – WCONT, matched controls) were recruited. The concentric knee extension (conc) and eccentric flexion exercises (ecc) were performed, and peak torque (PT) was used to calculate the FH/Q. Comparisons of PT between sexes (MSTK vs WSTK; MCONT vs WCONT) and comparisons of FH/Q between sexes and groups (MSTK vs MCONT; WSTK vs WCONT), considering dominant vs non-paretic side and non-dominant vs paretic side were performed by ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis test, when applicable.

Results: No significant FH/Q differences were found between STK vs CONT and sexes (non-paretic vs dominant). The paretic FH/Q was significantly higher than the non-dominant (CONT), for both sexes. PTconc and PTecc were significant higher for men, considering limbs comparisons. No significant PTecc an PTconc differences were found between STK vs CONT, for men’s non-paretic and paretic limb’s. However, men’s non-dominant limb presented a higher PTconc compared to men’s paretic limbs.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that individuals affected by stroke had a higher FH/Q in the paretic limb compared to the non-dominant limb of the control group, for both men and women. One interesting finding was the absence of significant FH/Q differences between men and women with stroke.

Disclosure of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 114.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.