555
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Acceptability of constraint induced movement therapy: influence of perceived difficulty and expected treatment outcome

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 507-515 | Received 15 Apr 2021, Accepted 10 Jul 2021, Published online: 23 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Constraint-Induced Movement (CI) Therapy has evidence of efficaciously rehabilitating upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke. Yet, it is not widely used in the United States. One barrier appears to be the perception of its difficulty among stroke care consumers, as reported by two published studies in which the participants had little or no apparent direct exposure to CI Therapy.

Objectives

Assess the perception of difficulty of CI Therapy by individuals with chronic stroke who have actually undergone CI Therapy.

Methods

A secondary analysis was conducted of data from two randomized controlled trials of CI Therapy. Participants had chronic, mild-to-moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke. The Motor Activity Log and Wolf Motor Function Test were used to measure motor function of the more-affected arm. A Patient Opinion Survey assessed participants’ perception of difficulty and satisfaction with treatment.

Results

The participants (N = 40) showed large improvements in motor function of their more-affected arm after treatment, p’s <001. CI Therapy was perceived to be of only moderate difficulty by participants before treatment (mean = 4.4 out of 7). Perception of its difficulty decreased afterward (mean = 3.7, p = .002). Moreover, participants were highly satisfied with their outcomes (mean = 6.3 out of 7). Satisfaction was positively related to the improvements in more-affected arm use in everyday life, ΔR2 = .3, p < .001.

Conclusions

Chronic stroke survivors who have actually had CI Therapy perceive it to be of only moderate difficulty and are highly satisfied. Negative views about its acceptability warrant reconsideration.

List of abbreviations

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 114.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.