Efficiency and usability of a modified pegboard incorporating computerized technology for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke

ABSTRACT

Background

Traditionally, a pegboard has been commonly used as a useful training and assessment tool for patients with stroke. However, training using pegboards could be monotonous and may discourage motivation in patients with stroke, as it requires only repetitive movements without feedback.

Objectives

We aimed to demonstrate the efficiency and usability of a novel rehabilitation instrument (Rapael Smart Pegboard; SP), which integrates computerized technology into a traditional pegboard.

Methods

This single-center study with a single-group pre–post design included 19 patients with hemiplegic stroke (11 outpatients and 8 inpatients). The patients received 20 SP training sessions (30 minutes per session, 5 days per week, over 4 weeks) according to their ability and status without any therapist intervention. The primary outcome was changes in the Fugl–Meyer assessment of upper extremity (FMA), and the secondary outcomes were changes in the Box and Block test and Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function test (JHFT). Additionally, usability assessment was performed.

Results

All outcome measurements except JHFT-gross score showed significant improvements with SP training. The significant improvements in these outcomes were consistently found in the outpatient group; however, the inpatient group failed to show improvement in the distal part of FMA, total JHFT score, and time. The usability test showed high satisfaction with 4.9 out of 5 points.

Conclusions

The SP is an effective and feasible instrument for upper limb rehabilitation. Moreover, the SP can be used as a self-training tool without the assistance of a health care practitioner.

KEYWORDS:

• Stroke rehabilitation
• usability
• computerized device
• computerized technology
• clinical trials

Acknowledgments

We thank to Young Geun Choi and Kyunghwan Yoo who developed the Rapael Smart Pegboard and provided constant technical support throughout the study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the Technology development Program (C0565179) funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea). Also, it was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20014480) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea).