Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS-Brazil)

ABSTRACT

Background

The Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) is a clinically useful measure of upper-limb (UL) capacity, which assesses both basic and advanced capacities.

Objectives

To examine the reliability, construct validity, and interpretability of the SULCS-Brazil with community-dwelling individuals with stroke.

Methods

The SULCS-Brazil and measures of impairment (handgrip strength and motor function of the paretic UL), capacity (manual and digital dexterities), and performance were applied during the first session, to establish construct validity (80 patients). The SULCS-Brazil was applied again during a second session (a sub-set of 30 patients), to investigate test–retest reliability. Test–retest reliability was evaluated using kappa statistics (k) for the individual items, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total scores, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman plot. For the evaluation of construct validity, pre-defined hypotheses were created to estimate the strength of the correlations between the SULCS-Brazil scores and established measures of UL function, using Spearman correlation coefficients. Interpretability was investigated by evaluating both ceiling/ floor effects.

Results

High level of agreement was found between the SUCLS-Brazil total scores obtained on both applications (ICC = 0.98; 95%CI:0.96–0.99) and 80% of the individual items had almost perfect agreement (k= 0.81–1.0). The SEM (0.46) and the MDC (1.27) showed clinically acceptable values. All pre-defined hypotheses were confirmed, indicating adequate construct validity of the SULCS-Brazil. No significant ceiling/floor effects were observed.

Conclusions

The SULCS-Brazil showed to be reliable and valid for the evaluation of upper-limb capacity of individuals with stroke.

KEYWORDS:

• Stroke
• outcome assessment
• measurement properties
• upper limb
• rehabilitation

Acknowledgments

Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq/UFMG) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES: Code 001) for the financial support.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ contributions

All the authors have made substantive contribution to the article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the [Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq/UFMG)]; and [Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)] under grant [number 001].