Outcomes and reflections on a consensus-building workshop for developing a spinal cord injury-related chronic pain research agenda

Abstract

Context/ Objective: Chronic pain following spinal cord injury (SCI) is a prevalent secondary health condition that significantly impacts quality of life (QoL). Although growing, the number of available effective pain management approaches for SCI is limited. Recognizing the need to “kick-start” activity on this topic, a consensus-building workshop on developing a research agenda for SCI-related chronic pain was held in 2006 with an expert panel. The present paper describes the processes of the consensus-workshop and its associated outcomes towards advancing the research agenda for SCI-related pain in Canada. A commentary on the current state of knowledge regarding SCI-related pain is also provided.

Methods: Thirty-nine stakeholders (researchers, clinicians, policy-makers, SCI advocates, and people with SCI) attended the consensus-workshop. A modified Delphi approach was employed to gain consensus on identifying the top five SCI pain research priorities for improving QoL post-SCI. As well, project planning along with infrastructure support opportunities were discussed.

Results: The top five pain research priorities were: 1) pain management and treatment; 2) measurement tools; 3) health services policy and advocacy; 4) knowledge transfer; and 5) mechanisms of pain. Recommendations related to the priorities and related resources were generated, and pilot work was initiated.

Conclusions: The consensus workshop provided an initial roadmap for research on SCI-related chronic pain, and supported five pilot projects on the identified priorities. Reflections on the current research landscape in Canada and abroad suggest increased activity towards addressing pain post-SCI but evidence-based approaches are still lacking.

Keywords:

• Spinal cord injuries
• Pain
• Quality of life
• Consensus development

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the consensus meeting participants for their time and efforts.

Disclaimer statements

Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This initiative was funded by a Team Planning and Development Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)—Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis (IMHA).