Factors associated with upper extremity contractures after cervical spinal cord injury: A pilot study

Abstract

Objective: To examine the prevalence of joint contractures in the upper limb and association with voluntary strength, innervation status, functional status, and demographics in a convenience sample of individuals with cervical spinal cord injury to inform future prospective studies.

Design: Cross-sectional convenience sampled pilot study.

Setting: Department of Veterans Affairs Research Laboratory.

Participants: Thirty-eight participants with cervical level spinal cord injury.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures: Contractures were measured with goniometric passive range of motion. Every joint in the upper extremity was evaluated bilaterally. Muscle strength was measured with manual muscle testing. Innervation status was determined clinically with surface electrical stimulation. Functional independence was measured with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III).

Results: Every participant tested had multiple joints with contractures and, on average, participants were unable to achieve the normative values of passive movement in 52% of the joints tested. Contractures were most common in the shoulder and hand. There was a weak negative relationship between percentage of contractures and time post-injury and a moderate positive relationship between percentage of contractures and age. There was a strong negative correlation between SCIM-III score and percentage of contractures.

Conclusions: Joint contractures were noted in over half of the joints tested. These joint contractures were associated with decreased functional ability as measured by the SCIM-III. This highlights the need the need for detailed evaluation of the arm and hand early after injury as well as continued monitoring of joint characteristics throughout the life course of the individual with tetraplegia.

Keywords:

• Spinal cord injuries
• Contracture
• Rehabilitation
• Tetraplegia
• Upper extremity

Disclaimer statements

Conflict of interest Authors have no conflicts of interest and no financial interest or benefit has arisen from the direct application of this research.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, I01-RX-00488.