327
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The influence of conventional T2 MRI indices in predicting who will walk outside one year after spinal cord injury

, , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 501-507 | Published online: 02 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Context/Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indices of spinal cord damage are predictive of future motor function after spinal cord injury (SCI): hyperintensity length, midsagittal tissue bridges, and Brain and Spinal Injury Center (BASIC) scores. Whether these indices are predictive of outdoor walking after SCI is unknown. The primary purpose was to see if these MRI indices predict the ability to walk outdoors one-year after SCI. The secondary purpose was to determine if MRI indices provide additional predictive value if initial lower extremity motor scores are available.

Design: Retrospective. Clinical T2-weighted MRIs were used to quantify spinal cord damage. Three MRI indices were calculated: midsagittal ventral tissue bridges, hyperintensity length, BASIC scores.

Setting: Academic hospital.

Participants: 129 participants with cervical SCI.

Interventions: Inpatient rehabilitation.

Outcomes Measures: One year after SCI, participants self-reported their outdoor walking ability.

Results: Midsagittal ventral tissue bridges, hyperintensity length, and BASIC scores significantly correlated with outdoor walking ability (R = 0.34, P < 0.001; R = −0.25, P < 0.01; Rs = −0.35, P < 001, respectively). Using midsagittal ventral tissue bridges and hyperintensity length, the final adjusted R2 for model 1 = 0.19. For model 2, the adjusted R2 using motor scores alone = 0.81 and MRI variables were non-significant. All five participants with observable intramedullary hemorrhage reported they were unable to walk one block outdoors.

Conclusions: The MRI indices were significant predictors of outdoor walking ability, but when motor scores were available, this was the strongest predictor and neither midsagittal tissue bridges nor hyperintensity length contributed additional value. MRI indices may be a quick and convenient supplement to physical examination when motor testing is unavailable.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Craig Hospital Research Board for their assistance with this project. This research was funded by a National Institutes of Health award, National Institute of Child Health and Development – NIH R03HD094577.

Data availability statement

Data available upon reasonable request from the authors.

Disclaimer statements

Contributors None.

Funding This work was supported by the NIH National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research under Grant R03HD094577.

Conflicts of interest Authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 184.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.