354
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Perceived eHealth literacy and health literacy among people with spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 118-125 | Published online: 07 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

Objectives:

This purpose of this research was to (1) to evaluate eHealth and general health literacy levels among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and (2) to identify relationships between eHealth literacy, general health literacy, and various sociodemographic factors.

Design:

Cross-sectional.

Setting:

The study was conducted in the community setting.

Participants:

As part of a larger study, a total of 50 community-dwelling individuals with SCI were recruited.

Interventions:

n/a.

Outcome Measures:

Quantitative online survey data were collected on participants’ sociodemographic characteristics, eHealth literacy (using the eHealth Literacy Scale), general health literacy (using the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool).

Results:

The average age of participants was 49 years old; 25 participants were male and 25 were female. A total of 39 participants experienced traumatic SCI and 11 participants experienced non-traumatic SCI. Participants demonstrated moderate levels of eHealth literacy (31.6 out of 40) and general health literacy (17.6 out of 20). A significant, positive correlation was found between eHealth literacy and general health literacy. Significant, positive correlations were found between general health literacy and sociodemographic factors, including income and education. A significant, negative correlation was found between general health literacy and time since injury.

Conclusion:

No previous studies we are aware of have evaluated perceived eHealth literacy and general health literacy among people with SCI. This study demonstrated the diverse range of eHealth literacy levels in SCI populations and how this, and other factors, may impact an individual’s ability to self-manage and adopt to eHealth technologies.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for the research study was provided by the Craig H. Neilson Foundation grant (grant number 44087). WBM’s work was supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. GS’ work was supported by a Research Training Award from WorkSafeBC (RS2017-TG04).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 184.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.