100
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rationale for the Chemical-Specific Adjustment Factors Used to Derive an Occupational Exposure Limit for Timolol Maleate

, &
Pages 99-111 | Published online: 10 Aug 2010
 

ABSTRACT

Timolol maleate is a non-selective beta-adrenergic blocking agent currently used primarily to reduce intraocular pressure in the treatment of glaucoma. It also produces effects on the heart and bronchial smooth muscle and all of these effects are of potential concern in workers handling this active pharmaceutical ingredient. The disposition of timolol maleate is influenced by a polymorphism in oxidative metabolism by CYP2D6 and two distinct phenotypes have been identified (i.e., poor and extensive metabolizers). These properties of timolol maleate provided an opportunity to use the compound as a case study to demonstrate the derivation of chemical-specific adjustment factors for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to replace the default uncertainty factor for interindividual variability. Overall, the available data on the pharmacodynamic endpoints showed very little variability and most pharmacokinetic studies failed to discern significant differences in relatively small groups of healthy volunteers or patients. Reports of bradycardia and bronchoconstriction in patients receiving therapeutic doses are relatively rare. In one study, there was a significant reduction in heart rate 24 hours post-dose that was associated with elevated area under the curve (AUC) values. A chemical-specific adjustment factor (CSAF) for kinetics of 9.8 based on these AUC data was combined with a CSAF for dynamics of 1.2 and applied to the extrapolated no-effect level for clinically significant cardiovascular effects (with correction for oral bioavailability) to establish an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for timolol maleate which is expected to be protective of workers that may be poor metabolizers or asthmatics.

Notes

NOAEL for critical endpoint.

CSAF = (Mean + 2SD)/Mean. (Adapted from Bartels et al. 1980 and CitationTanabe et al. 1979.)

24 hours post-dose. (Adapted from CitationLewis et al. (1985).) Data represent Means ± SD.

Values in brackets represent (Mean + 2SD)/Mean. (Adapted from CitationMcGourty et al. 1985.)

P < 0.05

∗∗P < 0.01

∗∗∗lower limit of detection; Cmax = maximum plasma concentration; C24 = plasma concentration at 24 hours; t1/2 = plasma elimination half-time; AUC = area under the plasma concentration curve. Adapted from CitationMcGourty et al. (1985).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 358.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.