ABSTRACT
The Operational Priority Substances (OPS) model is part of the European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances (EUSES) and is used to estimate air concentrations and atmospheric depositions for risk assessment of chemicals. Traditionally, EUSES assesses environmental exposure using a standardized scenario based on explicit assumptions and default parameter settings. Under the new European Union REACH legislation—which stands for Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and restriction of Chemicals—industry is responsible for the risk assessment of chemicals. The current work investigates the potential impact and importance of source parameter refinement on the emission distribution and environmental fate of chemicals as modelled by OPS. In total, 60 scenarios with different combinations of (non) default values for emission heat content, emission source height, and emission source radius, were run for a typical particle-bound substance. Increasing heat content and emission source height reduced the modelled air concentrations and depositions and caused maximum air concentrations to occur further away from the emission source. Results show that estimated air concentrations and total depositions used for risk assessment can become more realistic by using more site-specific emission source parameters. This article proposes risk assessment refinement options and provides recommendations on future updates of EUSES.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project has been supported by the Dutch Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing, and the Environment (VROM). We thank Dr. J.K. Kwisthout (VROM) for the financial support we received during this project. At RIVM, we also thank Dr. T. Vermeire and Prof. D. van de Meent for reviewing the current work.
Notes
*OPS distinguishes three major distributions: fine, medium, and coarse (CitationToet and de Leeuw 1992). As default setting, OPS uses the medium size particle distribution (van Jaarsveld 2008).
*For combinations with increasing radius, less reduction is obtained of the maximum concentration compared to the combination with a radius of 0 m.
*For combinations with increasing radius, less reduction is obtained of the average total deposition compared to the combination with a radius of 0 m.