Importance of Arsenic Speciation in Populations Exposed to Arsenic in Drinking Water

ABSTRACT

Total arsenic in urine is often the principal means for assessing chronic exposure to arsenic-contaminated drinking water. This approach ignores many components of the human diet, especially fish and seafood that contain arsenic at significant concentrations. The toxicity differences between the inorganic forms and the dietary forms suggest both should be evaluated when attempting to assess risk from arsenic exposure. Urine biomonitoring for 53 participants was used to confirm reduction in arsenic exposure resulting from well water remediation removing inorganic arsenic from drinking water. Initially, only total arsenic urine assays were performed, but spikes in total arsenic urine concentrations were determined to be diet related and demonstrated the need for analytical methods that differentiate the arsenic species. A secondary analysis was added that quantified inorganic-related arsenic in urine and the dietary forms related to fish and seafood by subtraction from total arsenic. Significant differences were found between the inorganic arsenic component and the total arsenic measured in their urine. On average, approximately 76% of total arsenic in urine was attributed to fish and other organo-arsenic dietary sources, implying a potential significant overestimate of exposure, and demonstrating the need for differentiation of the inorganic-related arsenic from dietary arsenic.

Key Words:

• arsenic biomonitoring
• drinking water
• hydride generation
• urinary arsenic
• water treatment
• inorganic arsenic

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Michael Gochfeld for inspiration and guidance, and acknowledge partial support from NIEHS ES05022. Recruitment and study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.