655
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Injunctive Peer Misperceptions and the Mediation of Self-Approval on Risk for Driving After Drinking Among College Students

, &
Pages 459-477 | Published online: 04 Feb 2013
 

Abstract

Of the alcohol-related risks faced by college students, it is arguable that none presents a greater public health hazard than driving after drinking (DAD). The present study examined the extent to which students' injunctive misperceptions toward DAD predicted the likelihood to engage in DAD and how this relation was mediated by self-approval of DAD. Participants were 2,848 college students (59.1% female, 64.6% Caucasian) from two U.S. West Coast universities who completed confidential web-based surveys assessing DAD beliefs and behaviors. Results revealed that respondents tended to overestimate their peers' approval toward DAD. Moreover, the subgroups likely to engage in DAD—men, 21 + years of age, Greek affiliated students, Caucasians, students with a family history of alcohol abuse—were also more likely to misperceive (i.e., overestimate) their peers' level of approval toward DAD. Using binary logistic regression analyses, self-approval of DAD emerged as an important statistical mediator in the relation between misperception of typical student approval toward DAD and engagement in DAD. Results point to the considerable role injunctive peer misperceptions may play in the pathways leading to drinking-driving risk. These findings provide preliminary support for DAD-specific social normative interventions, either complementing or supplementing existing alcohol interventions. By targeting high-risk student subgroups and communicating accurate drinking-driving norms, these proposed interventions have the potential to reduce self-approval and incidence of DAD.

Notes

Note. The driving after drinking variable represents driving after more than two drinks. Within each row, the 2% values sum to 100%.

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

Note. The driving after drinking variable represents driving after more than two drinks. All the measures are phrased in terms of drinking after driving, except for total weekly drinks.

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

Note. Odds ratios are adjusted, controlling for all other predictors within the model. Outcome is driving after more than two drinks (0 = no, 1 = yes).

a Gender (0 = female, 1 = male).

b Age (0 = younger than 21, 1 = 21 or older).

c Race (0 = non-Caucasian, 1 = Caucasian).

d Greek affiliation (0 = non-Greek, 1 = Greek).

e Family history of alcohol abuse (0 = negative, 1 = positive).

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 215.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.