710
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Moving Oral Contraceptives over the Counter: Theory-based Formative Research to Design Communication Strategy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 313-322 | Published online: 19 Apr 2020
 

Abstract

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that oral contraceptives (OC) should be available over the counter (OTC). This study explored women’s attitudes toward OC OTC in rural South Carolina. In-depth, individual interviews were conducted with 52 women ages 18–44 years old. Data analysis was informed by a reproductive justice theoretical framework and included an inductive, constant-comparative approach using HyperRESEARCH 3.7.5. Participants self-identified as either Black (62%) or White (28%). Participants believed that OC OTC would prevent unintended pregnancy by improving anonymity, convenience, and access to contraception. Many participants faced barriers to receiving a prescription, including time, transportation, cost, stigma, embarrassment, and clinician refusal based on religious reasons. Participants believed OC OTC would improve women’s control over their fertility and emphasized the importance of health insurance coverage for OC OTC. Some participants expressed concerns about the risk of side effects, contraindications, and the potential for abuse. Some participants believed women, especially adolescents, required physician guidance and an annual exam to use OC. Findings suggest that a lack of knowledge and misinformation about the risks of OC serve as a barrier among some women in rural areas. Widespread acceptance of OC OTC will require messaging strategies to dispel safety concerns about OC OTC and empower women.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the space provided by the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Beaufort in the conduct of this research. The authors thank the Women’s Health Research Team and Maja Grzejdziak, Mamiko Higa, Hannah Manzi, Stephanie Meier, Karishma Patel, and Sierra Small for their assistance in data collection. This research was supported in part by the College of Charleston’s Faculty Research and Development Grant, Humanities and Social Sciences Dean’s Discretionary Funds, and the Office of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 215.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.