Abstract
This article reports on the evaluation of “It's Your Business,” a dramatic radio serial promoting domestic violence prevention in the African-American community that was made available for national broadcast. Radio stations in 4 study cities committed to airing the broadcasts. However, in only 1 of the 4 was the broadcast carried out in even a limited way. Consequently, only data from one city could be used to assess impact. Even there only 9 percent of the sample could confidently be called exposed, answering a recall question correctly and claiming to hear more than 2 episodes. These moderately exposed respondents scored higher than non-exposed respondents on 21 out of 27 anti-domestic violence beliefs and behaviors; 10 differences were statistically significant. However, the moderate exposure group only displayed stronger outcomes than a group who claimed exposure but could not recall much about the program in 2 out of the 27 outcomes at a statistically significant level. We conclude that the association of moderate exposure and anti-domestic violence outcomes was most likely an artifact of selective perception, and not a result of exposure alone. The evaluation points to the need to better understand how exposure can be achieved to complement our work on developing messages.
A previous version of this paper was presented at the 50th International Communication Association annual conference, Acapulco, Mexico, May 2000.
Notes
1The website for the FVPF (www.fvpf.org) describes their mission and current activities.
2At the same time, CitationThe Advertising Council (1999) reported a 25% increase from 1997 to 1998 in donated radio time for their campaigns, to a total of over $700 million. Radio alone made up almost 60% of total media support to The Advertising Council totaling $1.2 billion in 1998 alone.
Notes: 1. NE = not exposed, ME = moderately exposed, and AE = ambiguously exposed. 2. Belief measures measured on a five point scale, where 1 = Strongly Agree and 5 = Strongly Disagree. Intention and behavior measures were dichotomous. Results in this table are uniformly presented so that higher numbers indicate a response consistent with program goals.