Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the nature of the women's contribution in family businesses in eighteenth-century Turin. Specifically, it discusses the reliability of the notion of unpaid work; it suggests that the latter is a too ambiguous concept and that some kind of distinction which clarifies the role played by each family member should be introduced. Economic and labour relationships between the partners or between the head of the household and other women of the family network were complicated by the presence of the female's personal property, and especially by the dowry. Married women invested in the family business their dowry or, alternatively, they used it in order to set up and run an independent economic activity or to buy a set of tools that enabled them to work autonomously. Widows (mothers or mothers-in-law) did the same. Women therefore were workers and owners at the same time. Their economic contribution to the household was based on an intricate mixture of physical work and property, and precisely for this reason they cannot be considered as an unpaid labour force. Finally, the paper shows that property gave the women the bargaining power necessary to negotiate their position in the household or to obtain some kind of help or support.
Notes
1. In recent years, many scholars employed the notion of unpaid work; some of them emphasised unpaid work such as various caregivers’ tasks, domestic work, childrearing and care given to ill and weak members of the family (Addabbo, Arrizabalaga, Borderías, & Owens, Citation2010). Other research refers mostly to work performed by women and other family members in the family business (Philipps, Citation2008).
2. Archivio di Stato di Torino (AST), I sez., Commercio, II add., Magistrato del Consolato, mazzo 2, Volume contente li nomi, cognomi e patria de’ mastri e padroni e de' loro rispettivi lavoranti ed apprendizzi delli arti e mestieri, 1792.
3. All the examples have been taken from the census of Turinese workshops carried out in 1792.
4. AST, sez. riun., Notai di Torino, vol. 2774, ff. 297r–302v.
5.Ibid.,Insinuazione di Torino, a. 1748, l. 4, ff. 423r–424r.
7. I studied the dowry system and the alienation of dowry in eighteenth-century Turin in chapters 2 and 3 of my book (Zucca Micheletto, Citation2014).
8. AST, sez. riun., Notai di Torino, vol. 2756, f. 527r.
9.Ibid., vol. 2777, ff. 290r–294r.
10.Ibid., vol. 2752, ff. 509r–514v.
11.Ibid., vol. 2778, ff. 58r–63r.
12.Ibid., vol. 2774, f. 409r–v.
14. AST, sez. riun., Insinuazione di Torino, a. 1761, l. 2, ff. 881r–894v.
15.Ibid., a. 1763, l. 5, ff. 47r–48v.
17. On independent business of unmarried women see: (Sharpe, Citation1999).
18. Number of couples for whom the job of the husband and of the wife is known.
20. AST, sez. riun., Insinuazione di Torino, a. 1765, l. 3, 1167r–1168v.
21.Ibid., a. 1774, l. 4, ff. 1459r–1460v.
22.Ibid., Consolato di Commercio, Registro dei Taffetieri, vol. 66, f.f. n.n.
23.Ibid., vol. 67, ff. 155r–159v.
27.Ibid., vol. 66, f.f. n.n.
29.Ibid., vol. 67, ff. 85r–91v.
30.Ibid., vol. 66, ff. n.n.
32.Ibid., vol. 67, ff. 107r–110v.
33. Archivio Storico del Comune di Torino (ASCT), Ospedale di Carità, cat. VI, Libri delle informazioni per i ricoveri, vol. 47, f. 844.
34.Ibid., vol. 40, f. 33.
36. AST, sez. riun., Consolato di Commercio, Registro dei Taffetieri, vol. 66, ff. n.n.
38.Ibid., Insinuazione di Torino, a. 1761, l. 8, ff. 1264v–1266r.
39.Ibid., a. 1764, l. 4, ff. 1353r–v.
40.Ibid., Consolato di Commercio, Bottonaj, vol. 6, ff. n. n.
41.Ibid., Insinuazione di Torino, a. 1770, l. 3, ff. 39r–44v.
Addabbo, T., Arrizabalaga, M. -P., Borderías, C., & Owens, A. (Eds.). (2010). Gender inequalities, households and the production of well-being in modern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate. Philipps, L. (2008). Silent partners: The role of unpaid market labor in families. Feminist Economics, 14, 37–57. Pene Vidari, G. S. (1980–81). Osservazioni sui rapporti patrimoniali fra coniugi nel Piemonte del sec. XVIII [Remarks on marital agreements in eighteenth-century Piedmont]. Rivista di Storia del, Diritto Italiano, 54, 19–60. Pene Vidari, G. S. (1983). Dote, famiglia e patrimonio fra dottrina e pratica in Piemonte [Dowry, family and assets between theory and practice in Piedmont]. In La famiglia e la vita quotidiana in Europa dal ‘400 al ‘600. Atti del colloquio, Milano 1–4 dicembre 1983 [Family and domestic life in Europe from 1400 to 1600. Proceedings of the workshop, Milan 1–4 December 1983] (pp. 109–121). Rome: Ed. Ministero Beni Culturali. Klapisch-Zuber, Ch. (1990). Le complexe de Griselda: Dots et dons de mariage [The complex of Griselda: Dowry and wedding gifts]. In Ch.Klapisch-Zuber (Ed.), La Maison et le nom. Stratégies et rituels dans l'Italie de la Renaissance [The Casa and the name. Strategies and rituals in Renaissance Italy]. (pp. 185–213). Paris: Ed. EHESS. Groppi, A. (1996). Lavoro e proprietà delle donne in età moderna [Female work and property in early modern age]. In A.Groppi (Ed.), Il lavoro delle donne [Women's work] (pp. 119–163). Rome-Bari: Laterza. Calvi, G., & Chabot, I. (Eds.). (1998). Le ricchezze delle donne. Diritti patrimoniali e poteri familiari in Italia (XIII–XIX secc.) [Female assets. Property rights and family power in Italy (13th–19th centuries)]. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier. Fubini Leuzzi, M. (1999). « Condurre a onore ». Famiglia, matrimonio e assistenza dotale a Firenze in Età Moderna [« Condurre a onore ». Family, marriage and support for dowry in Early Modern Florence]. Florence: Olschki Editore. Bellavitis, A. (2008). Famille, genre, transmission à Venise au XVIe siècle [Family, gender, transmission in sixteenth-century Venice]. Rome: : École Française de Rome. Zucca Micheletto, B. (2014). Travail et propriété des femmes en temps de crise (Turin, XVIIIe siècle) [Women work and property in hard times (Turin, 18th century)]. Mont-Saint-Aignan, France: Presses Universitaires de Rouen et du Havre. Palazzi, M. (1997). Donne sole. Storia dell'altra faccia dell'Italia tra antico regime e società contemporanea [Lonely women. History of the other face of Italy between Old Regime and contemporary society]. Milan: Bruno Mondadori. Bellavitis, A. (2008). Famille, genre, transmission à Venise au XVIe siècle [Family, gender, transmission in sixteenth-century Venice]. Rome: : École Française de Rome. Fauve-Chamoux, A. (1998). Vedove di città e vedove di campagna nella Francia preindustriale: Aggregato domestico, trasmissione e strategie familiari di sopravvivenza [Widows in the city and widows in the countryside in preindustrial France: Households, transmission and familial strategies for survival]. Quaderni Storici, 98, 301–332. Cavallo, S., & Warner, L. (Eds.). (1999). Widowhood in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. London-New York: Longman. Beauvalet-Boutouyrie, S. (2001). Être veuve sous l'Ancien Régime [Widows in old regime society]. Paris: Belin. Pellegrin, N., & Winn, C. H. (Eds.). (2003). Veufs, Veuves, Veuvages dans la France d'Ancien Régime [Widowers, Widows, Widowhood in Old Regime France]. Paris: Honoré Champion. Lanza, J. (2009). Les veuves dans les corporations parisiennes au XVIIIe siècle [Widows in guilds in Paris in eighteenth-century]. Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, 56, 92–122. Sharpe, P. (1999). Dealing with love: The ambiguous independence of the single woman in early modern England. Gender & History, 11, 209–232. Hanawalt, B. (1993). Growing up in Medieval London. The experience of childhood in history. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press. Krausman Ben-Amos, I. (1994). Adolescence and youth in Early Modern England. New Haven-London: Yale University Press. Béghin, C. (1996). Donneuses d'ouvrages, apprenties et salariées au XIVe et XVe siècles dans les sociétés urbaines languedociennes [Mistresses, apprentices and wage-earners in 14th and 15th centuries in urban societies of Languedoc]. Clio. Histoire, femmes, société, 3, 31–54. Bellavitis, A. (2006a). Le travail des femmes dans les contrats d'apprentissage de la Giustizia vecchia (Venise, XVIe siècle) [Women work and apprenticeship agreements at the Giustizia Vecchia court (Venice, 16th century)]. In I.Chabot, J.Hayez, & D.Lett (Eds.), La famille, les femmes et le quotidien (XIVe-XVIIIe siècle). Textes offerts à Christiane Klapisch-Zuber [Family, women and domestic life (14th–18th centuries). Papers in honour of Christiane Klapisch-Zuber] (pp. 181–195). Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne. Bellavitis, A. (2006b). Présentation [Presentation]. Histoire Urbaine, 15, 5–12. Crowston, C. H. (2005). L'apprentissage hors corporations. Les formations professionnelles alternatives à Paris sous l'Ancien Régime [Apprenticeship out of guilds. Alternative skilled learning patterns in Old Regime Paris]. Annales HSS, mars-avril, 2, 409–441. Erickson, A. L. (2011). Eleanor Mosley and other milliners in the City of London Companies 1700–1750. History Workshop Journal, 71, 147–172. Martinat, M. (2011). Travail et apprentissage des femmes à Lyon au XVIIIe siècle [Women's work and apprenticeship in eighteenth-century Lyon]. Mélanges de l'Ecole Française de Rome, Italie et Méditerranée MEFRIM, 123, 11–24. Cavallo, S. (2006). Métiers apparentés : Barbiers-chirurgiens et artisans du corps à Turin (xviie–xviiie siècle) [Related jobs : Barber-surgeons and artisans of the body in Turin (17th-18th centuries)]. Histoire Urbaine, 15, 27–48.