Unilateral Treatment Exit: A Failure of Retention or a Failure of Treatment Fit?

Abstract

This article highlights perceived weaknesses in the current understanding of unilateral client exit from alcohol and other drug psychosocial treatment. It is argued that unilateral client exit is typically interpreted as a “failure of retention” when it could equally be interpreted as a “failure of treatment fit”; that is, the failure to deliver treatment optimally suited to actual client attendance. The results from an exploratory study conducted within a failure of treatment fit framework are presented. This study explored the possibility that short-term outpatient alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment attendance may be an intentional service use strategy and that short-term attendees may exit AOD treatment as satisfied, successful, consumers. Standardized questionnaires were administered to clients (n = 109) starting a new treatment episode between June-August 2003 at admission and two-months post admission. Questionnaires explored the accuracy of client estimates of future appointment attendance, the reasons for short-term service exit, the satisfaction and outcome ratings of short-term clients, and the extent to which these compared with their longer-term peers. Findings suggest short-term treatment attendance is not an intentional service use strategy. However, despite attending fewer appointments than intended, most short-term participants reported significant levels of service satisfaction and problem improvement, and at a level comparable with their longer term peers. Problem-improvement was endorsed as the number one reason for short-term service exit. Implications for treatment delivery are discussed in light of these findings.

Keywords:

• unilateral exit
• dropout
• retention
• treatment delivery