http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3827-1549
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Background: The type of opioid used influences the severity and complications experienced. Natural opiates (opium and poppy husk) use is a socio-culturally accepted phenomenon reported in India. However, studies on their profile, quality of life, and addiction severity are limited. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional, observational study was to assess the socio-demographic profile, clinical profile, addiction severity, and quality of life of treatment-seeking natural opiate users. Method: Hundred subjects aged 18–65 years using opium or poppy husk seeking outpatient treatment at a tertiary addiction treatment center in India were interviewed to collect information on their socio-demography, natural opiate, and other substance use. Additionally, their addiction severity and quality of life were assessed using Addiction Severity Index-Lite and WHO Quality of Life-Bref instrument, respectively. Results: All subjects were male with a mean age of 44.6 (±11.0) years. Majority (97%) used poppy husk daily orally. Curiosity/experimentation (63%) was the most common reason for starting opiate use. The past month rates of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, and sedative-hypnotics use was 58%, 33%, 3%, and 12%, respectively. Only 4% injected any opioid. Inability to afford opiates (72%) was the most common reason for seeking treatment. Rates of medical, familial, social, psychological, and legal complications were low, while the WHOQOL-BREF scores fell between 40 and 50 across various domains. Conclusions/Importance: Natural opiate users may constitute distinct subgroup of opioid users with fewer/no complications despite long duration of uninterrupted use. These findings would be important in planning management strategies for people dependent on natural opiates.
KEYWORDS:
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.