447
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Prevention Awareness, Willingness, and Perceived Barriers among People Who Inject Drugs in Los Angeles and San Francisco, CA, 2016–2018

, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 2409-2419 | Published online: 23 Sep 2020
 

Abstract

Background

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is indicated for people who inject drugs (PWID), yet most studies do not focus on PWID. This study examines factors associated with PrEP awareness and willingness, and identifies perceived barriers to PrEP among PWID. Methods: PWID were interviewed in Los Angeles and San Francisco, CA from 2016 to 2018. We analyzed data from self-reported HIV-negative participants who had injected drugs within the past 6 months (n = 469). Questions on PrEP included awareness, willingness, barriers, and uptake. Multiple logistic regression models of factors associated with awareness of, and willingness to, take PrEP were developed. Descriptive statistics on perceived PrEP barriers are reported. Results: Among HIV-negative PWID, 40% were aware of PrEP, 59% reported willingness to take PrEP, and 2% were currently taking PrEP. In multivariable analysis, PrEP awareness was associated with study site and sexual minority status, higher educational attainment, and HIV testing in the last 6 months. Willingness to take PrEP was associated with self-reported risk (paying sex partner in the last 6 months, sharing drug paraphernalia, and being injected by another PWID) and perceived HIV risk. The most common perceived barriers to PrEP were copays, concerns about increased HIV or sexually transmitted risk with PrEP, and concerns about reduction of medication efficacy without daily use. Conclusion: PrEP awareness among PWID remains inadequate. Willingness to take PrEP was moderate and was most desired by PWID who engaged in high-risk behaviors. Interventions to increase PrEP awareness and willingness, and to facilitate PrEP uptake among PWID are needed.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank study participants for their time and effort in this project. We would also that the following individuals who meaningfully contributed to the study: Amin Afsahrezvani, Debra Allen, Letizia Alvarez, Julia Balboni, Joseph Becerra, Kacie Blackman, Guiseppe Cavaleri, Janae Chatmon, Fitsum Dejene, Karina Dominguez Gonzalez, Mohammed El-Farro, Brian Erwin, Sernah Essien, Allison Few, Hrant Gevorgian, Allessandra Gianino, Johnathan Hakakha, Jennifer Hernandez, Monika Howe, Alexander Ildaradashty, Cora Jenkins, Sasha Lasky, Joshua McKeever, Askia Mohammad, Rebecca Penn, Tasha Perdue, Jennifer Plumber, T’yana Taylor, Olivia Uhley, Jeffery Williams, David Wiss, Thomas Won, Senem Yilmaz, and Johnathan Zhao.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Data statement

Data will be made available to other investigators 1 year following the completion of this study (July 2020).

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [grant numbers RO1 DA038965, Project Official, Richard Jenkins, Ph.D.; T32 DA007233-31, PI: Falkin; and R25DA026401; PI Avelardo Valdez].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 943.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.