Abstract
Introduction: Adolescent e-cigarette use is a developing phenomenon. Greater surveillance of underage use is necessary to inform e-cigarette policy and mitigate adolescent e-cigarette use. Accurate prevalence estimates for adolescent e-cigarette use are provided by large national surveys. However, these surveys are costly and provide only annual estimates. To obtain more affordable estimates faster and more frequently, novel methods are required. Methods: Online search term popularity data were taken from Google Trends. Interest in vaping-related search terms were followed monthly from January 2011 to November 2020. Time-lagged zero-normalized cross-correlations were performed between the Google data and current (past 30 day) high-school e-cigarette use prevalence estimates from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). The search interest data were then calibrated to the NYTS data to estimate adolescent e-cigarette use prevalence using online searches. Results: Maximum correlation coefficients of 0.979 for “vapes” and 0.938 for “vape” were obtained when search interest lagged use prevalence by one month, and 0.970 for “vape pen” when the lag was two months (p < 0.001 for all). Calibrating the search term data to NYTS provided a high-school current e-cigarette use prevalence estimate of 12.1–18.4% for November 2020, suggesting adolescent use of e-cigarettes has continued to decline since the NYTS estimate of 19.6% for January–March 2020. Conclusions: Online search trend data may provide reasonably reliable and more frequent estimates of adolescent e-cigarette use prevalence at substantially lower costs than traditional surveys. Such additional data may help to assess immediate impacts of policies and events.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge Dr Arielle Selya for proof-reading this article, and Joe Gitchell for providing insightful comments and suggestions.
Declaration of interest
In 2020, Floe Foxon became a consultant to PinneyAssociates, Inc. PinneyAssociates provides consulting services on tobacco harm reduction on an exclusive basis to Juul Labs, Inc. In recent years, PinneyAssociates has consulted for British American Tobacco and Reynolds American Inc and subsidiaries on tobacco harm reduction. Juul Labs, Inc. did not sponsor this article or participate in the design, study execution, data analysis, writing, or publication.
Funding
This work was not supported by any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.