A Systematic Review on Alcohol Consumption among Non-Religious and Religious Adults

Abstract

Background: Research has suggested that religiosity is a protective factor in alcohol use, but this is an area that could be further explored. Objective: To undertake a systematic review of the literature on drinking patterns and their relationship with religiosity and non-religiosity in adult populations. Methods: We searched for relevant studies using the PubMed, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, and Psych-INFO databases. This review included only studies of people aged 18 and over which had a non-religious group as a comparison measure. Results: Fifty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The present review showed that religious people tend to have lower alcohol consumption compared to those with no religion. However, this difference appears only when religions are analyzed together without differentiating between religious affiliations (Catholicism, Buddhism, Evangelicalism, etc.). Some religious affiliations, such as Buddhism, Catholicism and Lutheranism, appear to be risk factors for alcohol consumption. Definitions of risk consumption showed high heterogeneity, ranging from eight to 21 or more doses per week, a difference of 13 doses of alcohol between studies. Conclusions: The present review showed that religious people tend to have lower alcohol consumption compared to non-religious people. However, the results are contradictory when religious affiliations are analyzed separately and compared with non-religious participants. Adequately understanding which dimensions of religiosity and non-religiosity (e.g., group processes, engagement, meaning, rules of behavior) are protective in adulthood is fundamental to the construction of more effective interventions in this age group.

Keywords:

• drinking pattern
• religiosity
• non-religiosity
• atheism
• beliefs

Acknowledgments

Our studies have been supported by the Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa (AFIP), and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). We thank Dr. Gabriel Natan Pires for sharing his methodological knowledge, which was essential to the improvement of our paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study is supported by grant from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP); C.C. (PhD scholarship − 2020/10234-2).