220
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Review

Methodological consistency and measurement reliability of transversus abdominis real time ultrasound imaging in chronic low back pain populations: a systematic review

, &
Pages 48-59 | Published online: 10 Feb 2017
 

Abstract

Background: Real time ultrasound imaging (RTUI) is used to measure transversus abdominis (TrA) thickness in low back pain (LBP) populations. However, individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) pose specific imaging challenges, such as older age and higher body mass index, compared to asymptomatic populations or acute and sub-acute LBP groups. These challenges potentially increase measurement error and may require different imaging methods.

Objectives: This review describes the methodologies and reported reliability for RTUI measurement of TrA specific to CLBP populations.

Methods: A systematic database search of Medline, CINAHL, PEDro, the full Cochrane library, Scopus, and Informit identified 20 studies that used RTUI to measure TrA of CLBP participants. Two independent raters appraised the quality of the studies using the QualSyst and the QAREL critical appraisal tools.

Results: Methodological quality varied from low to high. Methods for patient and transducer positioning and muscle measurement were inconsistent between studies. Eight articles cited reliability results from past studies of non-CLBP populations. Only two studies reported reliability in CLBP populations specifically and found higher Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for thickness measures at rest (0.63–0.97), compared to thickness change over time or contraction ratios (0.28–0.80).

Conclusions: Inconsistency of methodology, variable methodological quality, and limited and variable reliability reporting was highlighted in this review. This LBP subgroup poses challenges for RTUI, therefore future research should include standarized methods for image acquisition. This will improve the quality of study methods, reliability of TrA measurement, and improve the applicability and comparibility of research evidence available to clinicians.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 326.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.