467
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Classification of pregnancy related non-specific low back pain and pelvic girdle pain: a systematic review

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 156-174 | Received 15 Jan 2019, Accepted 24 Jun 2019, Published online: 12 Jul 2019
 

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy related non-specific low back pain (PNSLBP) and pelvic girdle pain (PGP) affect almost half of pregnant women, causing substantial disability for some. These diagnoses, which may represent several possible individual or co-occurring conditions, lack the specificity required to guide personalized treatment decisions. A reliable and valid classification is needed to direct effectiveness research and inform treatment strategies.

Objectives: To describe the psychometric properties of pathoanatomic classifications of PNSLBP and PGP as well as to assess the risk of bias of supporting evidence.

Methods: Two independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and PEDro databases and conducted a manual search of reference list of eligible articles reporting office-based examination for classifying PNSLBP/PGP. QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of reviewed studies.

Results: Ten studies were eligible. Inter-rater reliability was 87% for PNSLBP and 84.6% for PGP. Major sources of potential bias included the lack of reference standard diagnostic tests, insufficient blinding, non-systematic order of index test application, and unclear participant selection procedures. Patient flow throughout studies and the interval between testing (flow and timing) showed the lowest risk of bias. The applicability of the reference standard had the highest concern, while participant selection and index test had the lowest.

Conclusion: Although acceptable inter-rater reliability has been demonstrated, there is no current evidence to support the validity of PNSLBP and PGP classification systems. Future studies should consider including reference standard diagnostic tests, random order sequencing of index tests, rigorous selection criteria, and blinded assessors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 326.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.