Abstract
Background
Many stroke survivors do not regain full function of their upper limb, which can have a devastating effect for participation in daily activities.
Objectives
This research aimed to systematically review stroke survivors’ lived experiences of upper limb recovery. Our objectives explored stroke survivors’ barriers and facilitators to recovery and the clinical implications for health professionals.
Methods
We searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMCARE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science using keywords and synonyms of ‘stroke survivors’, ‘upper limb’, ‘recovery’, and ‘perspectives’. Studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative checklist. Data were analyzed descriptively and analytically using a thematic synthesis approach. We graded the emerging descriptive themes using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual). A protocol was registered apriori in PROSPERO (ID:181379).
Results
Eleven studies were included for review. Nine descriptive themes and three analytical themes emerged from the data that influenced upper limb recovery: 1) psychological wellbeing, 2) rehabilitation, and 3) relationships.
Conclusions
Barriers to upper limb recovery included health professionals’ attitudes particularly towards a lack of inclusivity in goal setting. In addition, stroke survivors perceived therapists focused on upper limb compensation rather than functional recovery, which was disempowering. Facilitators that enhanced recovery included the stroke survivors’ personal attitudes (psychological well-being) and external supports from family, friends, health professionals, and stroke survivor peers. Such supports enhanced the stroke survivors’ journey towards acceptance and adapting to their ‘new normal’ thus building confidence and self-efficacy to re-establish identity.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Carol Davison from the University of Otago Library for her assistance with database searching.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Rose Plowman
The first four authors are Bachelor of Physiotherapy students in their final year of the programme. The review was undertaken as part of the requirements for their research paper. Rose Plowman is a clinical educator with an interest in neuro-rehabilitation who co-supervised this research project. Dr Ally Calder, the primary supervisor has a research interest in stroke rehabilitation and recovery.