Plus ça Change, Plus C’est la Même Chose: The “New” Terrorism

Abstract

The immediate perception after 9/11 was that we were entering a world of “new terrorism”: new actors, new tactics, new responses. And yet more than a decade later, it seems that not much has really changed, or that the changes have been contextual rather than structural. Authors have used the modifier “new” in many different ways, creating a contested and confused understanding of what terrorism is and how it appears in the world. The same applies to how one defines terrorism, examines its domains and forms, delineates its actors and strategies, or compares it to state violence and fear in international relations. This raises the question of why scholars, rather than agreeing on a definition of terrorism, have focused on its many contexts, applications, and psychologies, concluding that there is a substantial and significant difference between the old and the new terrorism. However, when one tests this notion of the “new terrorism” against the case of Al-Qaeda, one finds that the tactical changes, primarily technological, as well as those in motivation and organization, are hardly new, and that the structural, ideological, and political features of terrorism have remained fundamentally the same.

Notes

1. George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman (Cambridge, MA: The University Press, 1903), 183.

2. Philip Zelikov, Bonnie D. Jenkins, and Ernest R. May, The 9/11 Commission Report (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2004), 47–48, 361–63.

3. Steven Simon and Daniel Benjamin, “America and the New Terrorism,” Survival 42.1 (Spring 2000): 59–75. See in particular Walter Laqueur, The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), and Bruce Hoffman, Inside Terrorism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).

4. Walter Laqueur, “Postmodern Terrorism: New Rules for an Old Game,” Foreign Affairs (September-October 1996).

5. Walter Laqueur, “The New Terrorism: Coming Soon to a City Near You,” The Economist (London), 348.8081, 15 August 1998, 17–19.

6. Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent (London: Wordsworth, 1997).

7. John M. Broder, “President Steps Up War on New Terrorism,” New York Times, 23 January (1999), A14.

8. Hoffman, Inside Terrorism, 127.

9. J. Bowyer Bell, “Trends on Terror: The Analysis of Political Violence,” World Politics 29.3 (1977): 479.

10. Hans Maier, “Der Neue Terrorismus” (1977), in Religion und modern Gesellschaft (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 1985), 222; translated by Douglas Cremer.

11. Bell, “Trends on Terror: The Analysis of Political Violence,” 476.

12. Thomas Friedman, “State-Sponsored Terror Called Threat to U.S.,” New York Times, 30 December 1983, A1, A6.

13. Editorial, Los Angeles Times, 13 December 1983, C6.

14. Rae Corelli, “The Menacing Face of the New Terrorism,” Maclean’s, 28 April 1986, 24ff.

15. William Gutteridge, ed., The New Terrorism (London: Mansell Publishing, 1986), ix,

x.

16. Jeffrey Simon, “Talking Terror to the People,” Los Angeles Times, 4 September 1988, E2.

17. Robin Wright and Norman Kempster, “Bloodier Standard Set, Experts Fear : Pan Am Bombing May Escalate Terror Trend,” Los Angeles Times, 31 December 1988, A1.

18. Benjamin Barber, Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy (New York: Ballantine Books, 1995).

19. René Passet and Jean Liberman, “Mondialisation Financière et Terrorisme: La Donne a-t-elle Changé Depuis le 11 Septembre?” Editions de l'Atelier, 18 September 2002.

20. François Heisbourg, Hyperterrorisme, la nouvelle guerre (Paris: Odile Jacob, 2001); see also François Heisbourgm, “Anatomie du nouveau terrorisme,” Le Débat 119 (2002): 98–107.

21. Laqueur, The New Terrorism.

22. Jerrold M. Post, “The New Face of Terrorism: Socio-cultural Foundations of Contemporary Terrorism,” Behavioral Sciences and the Law 23 (2005): 462.

23. Martha Crenshaw, ed., Terrorism in Context (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007), 4, ix.

24. Laqueur, The New Terrorism.

25. Alex P. Schmid, Political Terrorism: A Research Guide to Concepts, Theories, Databases, and Literature (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 1983).

26. James M. Poland, Understanding Terrorism: Groups, Strategies, and Responses (New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988), and J. Lodge, Terrorism: A Challenge to the State (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981).

27. Robert A. Friedlander, Terrorism and the Law: What Price Safety? (Gaithersburg, MD: IACP, 1981).

28. National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, Disorders and Terrorism: Report of the Task Force on Disorders and Terrorism (Washington, D.C.: National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, 1976), 3.

29. Lester A. Sobel, Political Terrorism (New York: Facts on File, 1975).

30. Thomas Perry Thornton, “Terror as a Weapon of Political Agitation,” in Internal War, ed. Harry Eckstein (New York: Free Press, 1964).

31. Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, trans. Leon S. Roudiez. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982), 19.

32. Isabelle Duyvesteyn, “How New is the New Terrorism?” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27.5 (2004): 442–43.

33. Laqueur, The New Terrorism, 5.

34. Jerrold M. Post, “The New Face of Terrorism: Socio-cultural Foundations of Contemporary Terrorism,” Behavioral Sciences and the Law 23 (2005): 462.

35. Duyvesteyn, “How New is the New Terrorism?” 440.

36. Clark McCauley, “Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism,” in Psychology of Terrorism: Theoretical Understandings and Perspectives (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002), 33–34.

37. Alexander Spencer, “Questioning the Concept of ‘New Terrorism,’” Peace, Conflict and Development 8 (2006): 18.

38. David Tucker, “What’s New about the New Terrorism and How Dangerous Is It?” Terrorism and Political Violence 13 (2001): 1–14.

39. David C. Rapoport, “Fear and Trembling: Terrorism in Three Religious Traditions,” American Political Science Review 78.3 (1984): 658–77.

40. Audrey Kurth Cronin, “Behind the Curve: Globalization and International Terrorism,” International Security 27.3 (2003): 38.

41. Martha Crenshaw, “The Debate over ‘New’ vs. ‘Old’ Terrorism,” Values and Violence 4 (2008): 134.

42. Crenshaw, “The Debate over ‘New’ vs. ‘Old’ Terrorism,” 133.

43. Peter Merkl, ed., The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty-Five (London: Macmillan, 1995).

44. Andrew H. Kydd and Barbara F. Walter, “The Strategies of Terrorism,” International Security 31.1 (2006): 51.

45. Kydd and Walter, “The Strategies of Terrorism,” 66.

46. Zenonas Tziarras, “Thoughts on New Terrorism,” The GW Post, 31 October 2011.

47. Peter Nuemann, Old & New Terrorism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009), 15.

48. Brian M. Jenkins, International Terrorism: A New Kind of Warfare (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp., 1974).

49. Duyvesteyn, “How New is the New Terrorism?” 443.

50. Lawrence Freedman, “A New Type of War,” in Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order, ed. Ken Booth and Tim Dunne (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 2002), 38.

51. Merkl, The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty-Five.

52. Duyvesteyn, “How New is the New Terrorism?” 439–54.