Abstract
This study focuses on the evaluation of one year of chat reference transcripts at the University of Connecticut (UConn) Libraries. Over 3,000 session transcripts were examined and coded to determine type, accuracy, instruction, and escalation of questions received through our chat reference service to identify potential staffing and training needs. The findings reveal that the librarians providing virtual reference services are extremely accurate in their answers (93%), but the type of questions received and the rate of referral to other staff and services indicate a potential need for more and varied staffing and training solutions.
Notes
In 2012, UConn Libraries implemented an optional three-question satisfaction survey for patrons who used the virtual reference service. For the 2012–2013 academic year, 88% indicated their chat experience as “very good” or “good,” and 87% indicated they would “absolutely” use the service again.