ABSTRACT
A total of 416 day-old ostrich chicks were randomly allocated to one of the three different husbandry practices for 3 months after hatch; HP1 (extensive human presence with gentle human voice, visual and gentle physical stimuli), HP2 (similar to HP1 but without physical stimuli) and S (human presence limited to supply of feed and water). Chick weight (kg) was measured at 6 and 12 weeks of age, while mortalities were recorded daily to calculate the survival rate. Finally, chicks’ antibody responses to vaccination against Newcastle disease (NCD) was measured using the Hemagglutination-Inhibition (HI) test at 20 weeks of age. While HP1 chicks were heavier and survived better to 6 weeks of age than HP2 and S chicks (p < .05), no difference was observed thereafter (p > .05). Furthermore, HP1 chicks had an improved immune competence, as illustrated by their lower percentage of positive HI titers, compared to HP2 and S chicks (p < .05). Hence, integrating extensive human presence with positive human-chick interactions may assist in alleviating challenges related to chick rearing in the ostrich industry.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Western Cape Department of Agriculture and the Oudtshoorn Research Farm for the use of the resource flock and facilities. Funding provided by the National Research Foundation, as well as the Western Cape Agricultural Research Trust is gratefully acknowledged. The assistance of Ms Naomi Serfontein, the late Mr Ndabenhle Eugene Mathenwja and the staff at the Oudtshoorn Research Farm is also greatly appreciated.